» Articles » PMID: 20396639

Milnacipran and Venlafaxine at Flexible Doses (up to 200 Mg/day) in the Outpatient Treatment of Adults with Moderate-to-severe Major Depressive Disorder: a 24-week Randomized, Double-blind Exploratory Study

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Apr 17
PMID 20396639
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of milnacipran and venlafaxine administered at flexible doses (100, 150 or 200 mg/day, bid administration) for 24 weeks (including 4 weeks up titration period) in the outpatient treatment of adults presenting with a moderate or severe episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) without high suicidal risk (MINI-DSM IV-TR). Of the 195 patients included, 134 (68.7%) completed the study. At baseline the two groups were similar, except there was a higher proportion of patients whose episode was severe-DSM IV in the milnacipran group (63.3% versus 54.0% in the venlafaxine group). The initial MADRS score (mean 31.0) decreased progressively during the study, and this decrease was in the two treatment groups (n = 177: 90 milnacipran; 87 venlafaxine) at week 24 (observed case/OC, mean change -23.1 milnacipran; -22.4 venlafaxine). The rate of MADRS response (reduction >/= 50%) at week 8 and week 24-last observation carried forward/LOCF was similar in the two groups (week 8: 64.4% milnacipran; 65.5% venlafaxine; week 24: 70% milnacipran; 77% venlafaxine), as was the rate of MADRS remission (score </= 10) (week 8: 42.2% milnacipran; 42.5% venlafaxine; week 24: 52.2% milnacipran; 62.1% venlafaxine). In both groups, the most common adverse events were: nausea, dizziness, headache, hyperhidrosis and, in males, genito-urinary problems. The overall safety/tolerability and efficacy profiles of milnacipran and venlafaxine administered at flexible dosages (up to 200 mg/day) were similar in the long term treatment of adults during episodes of MDD in an outpatient setting.

Citing Articles

Major Depressive Disorder and Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists.

Li W, Sun H, Chen H, Yang X, Xiao L, Liu R Transl Perioper Pain Med. 2016; 1(2):4-16.

PMID: 27213169 PMC: 4871611.


Double-blind, comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depression.

Kamijima K, Hashimoto S, Nagayoshi E, Koyama T Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013; 9:555-65.

PMID: 23650446 PMC: 3640608. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S42915.

References
1.
Machado M, Iskedjian M, Ruiz I, Einarson T . Remission, dropouts, and adverse drug reaction rates in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(9):1825-37. DOI: 10.1185/030079906X132415. View

2.
Bauer M, Tharmanathan P, Volz H, Moeller H, Freemantle N . The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009; 259(3):172-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. View

3.
Lepine J, Gastpar M, Mendlewicz J, Tylee A . Depression in the community: the first pan-European study DEPRES (Depression Research in European Society). Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997; 12(1):19-29. View

4.
Okumura K, Furukawa T . Remission rates with milnacipran 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day in the long-term treatment of major depression. Clin Drug Investig. 2006; 26(3):135-42. DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200626030-00003. View

5.
Weissman M, Bland R, Canino G, Faravelli C, Greenwald S, Hwu H . Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. JAMA. 1996; 276(4):293-9. View