» Articles » PMID: 20394061

Connections of the Auditory Brainstem in a Songbird, Taeniopygia Guttata. I. Projections of Nucleus Angularis and Nucleus Laminaris to the Auditory Torus

Overview
Journal J Comp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Apr 16
PMID 20394061
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Auditory information is important for social and reproductive behaviors in birds generally, but is crucial for oscine species (songbirds), in particular because in these species auditory feedback ensures the learning and accurate maintenance of song. While there is considerable information on the auditory projections through the forebrain of songbirds, there is no information available for projections through the brainstem. At the latter levels the prevalent model of auditory processing in birds derives from an auditory specialist, the barn owl, which uses time and intensity parameters to compute the location of sounds in space, but whether the auditory brainstem of songbirds is similarly functionally organized is unknown. To examine the songbird auditory brainstem we charted the projections of the cochlear nuclei angularis (NA) and magnocellularis (NM) and the third-order nucleus laminaris (NL) in zebra finches using standard tract-tracing techniques. As in other avian species, the projections of NM were found to be confined to NL, and NL and NA provided the ascending projections. Here we report on differential projections of NA and NL to the torus semicircularis, known in birds as nucleus mesencephalicus lateralis, pars dorsalis (MLd), and in mammals as the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc). Unlike the case in nonsongbirds, the projections of NA and NL to MLd in the zebra finch showed substantial overlap, in agreement with the projections of the cochlear nuclei to the ICc in mammals. This organization could suggest that the "what" of auditory stimuli is as important as "where."

Citing Articles

The songbird connectome (OSCINE-NET.ORG): structure-function organization beyond the canonical vocal control network.

Savoy A, Anderson K, Gogola J BMC Neurosci. 2024; 25(1):79.

PMID: 39731002 PMC: 11681764. DOI: 10.1186/s12868-024-00919-3.


Axonal Projection Patterns of the Dorsal Interneuron Populations in the Embryonic Hindbrain.

Hirsch D, Kohl A, Wang Y, Sela-Donenfeld D Front Neuroanat. 2022; 15:793161.

PMID: 35002640 PMC: 8738170. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2021.793161.


Auditory processing in the zebra finch midbrain: single unit responses and effect of rearing experience.

Logerot P, Smith P, Wild M, Kubke M PeerJ. 2020; 8:e9363.

PMID: 32775046 PMC: 7384439. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9363.


Spike threshold adaptation diversifies neuronal operating modes in the auditory brain stem.

Lubejko S, Fontaine B, Soueidan S, MacLeod K J Neurophysiol. 2019; 122(6):2576-2590.

PMID: 31577531 PMC: 6966316. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00234.2019.


Inhibitory Neural Circuits in the Mammalian Auditory Midbrain.

Ono M, Ito T J Exp Neurosci. 2018; 12:1179069518818230.

PMID: 30559596 PMC: 6291857. DOI: 10.1177/1179069518818230.


References
1.
Conlee J, Parks T . Origin of ascending auditory projections to the nucleus mesencephalicus lateralis pars dorsalis in the chicken. Brain Res. 1986; 367(1-2):96-113. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91583-0. View

2.
Braun K, Scheich H, Heizmann C, Hunziker W . Parvalbumin and calbindin-D28K immunoreactivity as developmental markers of auditory and vocal motor nuclei of the zebra finch. Neuroscience. 1991; 40(3):853-69. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90017-i. View

3.
Fortune E, Margoliash D . Parallel pathways and convergence onto HVc and adjacent neostriatum of adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J Comp Neurol. 1995; 360(3):413-41. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903600305. View

4.
Wild J . The auditory-vocal-respiratory axis in birds. Brain Behav Evol. 1994; 44(4-5):192-209. DOI: 10.1159/000113577. View

5.
Puelles L, Robles C, MartInez-de-la-Torre M, Martinez S . New subdivision schema for the avian torus semicircularis: neurochemical maps in the chick. J Comp Neurol. 1994; 340(1):98-125. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903400108. View