» Articles » PMID: 20392927

Evaluation of a New Selective Medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for Detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Different Specimens

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2010 Apr 16
PMID 20392927
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The sensitivity of screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be improved by adding other specimen sites to nares. We describe an evaluation of a new selective medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA II (CMRSAII), for its ability to detect MRSA from different specimen types. CMRSAII is a chromogenic medium which incorporates cefoxitin for the detection of MRSA. A study was performed at four clinical laboratories with the following specimens: 1,446 respiratory, 694 stool, 1,275 skin, and 948 wound specimens and 688 blood culture bottles containing Gram-positive cocci. The recovery of MRSA on traditional culture media was compared to results with CMRSAII. S. aureus was tested by cefoxitin disk diffusion. CMRSAII was interpreted as positive for MRSA at 24 h (range, 18 to 28 h) based solely on the visualization of mauve-colored colonies and at 48 h (range, 36 to 52 h) based on detection of mauve colonies with subsequent confirmation as S. aureus (by coagulase or latex agglutination testing). MRSA was recovered more frequently on CMRSAII (89.8% at 24 h and 95.6% at 48 h) than on traditional culture plates (83.1% at 24 h and 79.8% at 48 h) for all specimen types combined (P < 0.001). The percent sensitivities of CMRSAII at 24- and 48-h reads, respectively, were 85.5 and 92.4% for respiratory specimens, 87.9% and 98.3% for stool specimens, 88.4% and 96.1% for skin specimens, 92.1% and 94.6% for wound specimens, and 100% and 100% for positive blood cultures. The specificity was 99.8% for respiratory specimens and 100% for all others. In conclusion, CMRSAII is a reliable screening medium for multiple specimen types.

Citing Articles

Comparative assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus diagnostic assays for use in resource-limited settings.

Ayebare A, Bebell L, Bazira J, Ttendo S, Katawera V, Bangsberg D BMC Microbiol. 2019; 19(1):194.

PMID: 31438852 PMC: 6704615. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1566-8.


Management of methicillin-resistant mediated ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Dahal M, Schwan W Curr Trends Microbiol. 2019; 12:95-107.

PMID: 31341354 PMC: 6656405.


[Evaluation of a rapid assay for detection of PBP2a Staphylococcus aureus].

Sainz-Rodriguez R, de Toro-Peinado I, Valverde-Troya M, Bermudez Ruiz M, Palop-Borras B Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019; 32(4):370-374.

PMID: 31293115 PMC: 6719650.


Detection of MRSA in nasal swabs-marked reduction of time to report for negative reports by substituting classical manual workflow with total lab automation.

Burckhardt I, Horner S, Burckhardt F, Zimmermann S Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 37(9):1745-1751.

PMID: 29943308 PMC: 6133036. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3308-5.


Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Xu Z, Hou Y, Peters B, Chen D, Li B, Li L Mol Biol Rep. 2016; 43(11):1205-1212.

PMID: 27562853 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-016-4062-3.


References
1.
Flayhart D, Hindler J, Bruckner D, Hall G, Shrestha R, Vogel S . Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(11):5536-40. PMC: 1287825. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5536-5540.2005. View

2.
Colakoglu S, Aliskan H, Senger S, Turunc T, Demiroglu Y, Arslan H . Performance of MRSA ID chromogenic medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures and clinical specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007; 59(3):319-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.05.008. View

3.
Calfee D, Salgado C, Classen D, Arias K, Podgorny K, Anderson D . Strategies to prevent transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29 Suppl 1:S62-80. DOI: 10.1086/591061. View

4.
Bignardi G, Lowes S . MRSA screening: throat swabs are better than nose swabs. J Hosp Infect. 2009; 71(4):373-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.01.003. View

5.
van Loo I, van Dijk S, Verbakel-Schelle I, Buiting A . Evaluation of a chromogenic agar (MRSASelect) for the detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with clinical samples in The Netherlands. J Med Microbiol. 2007; 56(Pt 4):491-494. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47016-0. View