» Articles » PMID: 20392431

Vaccination of Commercial Broiler Chicks Against Avian Metapneumovirus Infection: a Comparison of Drinking-water, Spray and Oculo-oral Delivery Methods

Overview
Journal Vaccine
Date 2010 Apr 16
PMID 20392431
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) has become an important cause of viral respiratory infections in turkey and chickens. Live and inactivated vaccinations are available worldwide for prevention of disease and economic losses caused by this pathogen. The efficacy of these vaccines is vigorously tested under laboratory conditions prior to use in the field. In this study, a live subtype B aMPV vaccine was administered by spray, drinking water or oculo-oral methods to separate groups of broiler chicks under field conditions. Following this, the chicks were immediately transferred to separate rooms in an experimental isolation house, monitored and challenged with virulent subtype B aMPV. No clinical signs were recorded following the vaccination methods. In the oculo-oral vaccinated chicks, 40-60% of the birds were vaccine virus positive by RT-PCR. In addition, in comparison to other groups, statistically higher levels of aMPV ELISA antibodies were detected. After spray vaccination, the number of chicks positive for the vaccine virus increased gradually from 10% at one week to 30% by 3 weeks post vaccination. Following drinking water vaccination, 30% of chicks were aMPV positive at 1 week but negative by 3 weeks post vaccination. In both, spray and drinking water vaccinated groups, no ELISA antibodies were detected, but when challenged all chicks were protected against disease. At 5 days post challenge, 100% of chicks in the unvaccinated and those vaccinated by spray or drinking water routes but only 20% of the oculo-oral-vaccinated chicks were aMPV positive by RT-PCR. At 10 days post challenge, 10% of chicks in each group were aMPV RT-PCR positive. On challenge, all vaccinated chicks were protected against disease. It appears that when aMPV vaccine is accurately applied to chicks by spray or drinking water routes, both are capable of giving protection against clinical disease equal to that induced in those chicks vaccinated individually by the oculo-oral route.

Citing Articles

Mass vaccination with reassortment-impaired live H9N2 avian influenza vaccine.

Cargnin Faccin F, Caceres C, Gay L, Seibert B, van Bentem N, Rodriguez L NPJ Vaccines. 2024; 9(1):136.

PMID: 39097573 PMC: 11297921. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-024-00923-y.


Assessing the Impact of Spraying an Based Probiotic on Day-Old Broiler Chicks at Hatch on the Incidence of Bacterial Chondronecrosis with Osteomyelitis Lameness Using a Challenge Model.

Do A, Anthney A, Alharbi K, Asnayanti A, Meuter A, Alrubaye A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38731373 PMC: 11083080. DOI: 10.3390/ani14091369.


Trends and Challenges in the Surveillance and Control of Avian Metapneumovirus.

Salles G, Pilati G, Muniz E, de Lima Neto A, Vogt J, Dahmer M Viruses. 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37766366 PMC: 10535940. DOI: 10.3390/v15091960.


Efficacy of a novel avian metapneumovirus live vaccine candidate based on vaccination route and age.

Youn H, Noh J, Kim M, Ju H, Park D, Lee D Poult Sci. 2021; 100(3):100528.

PMID: 33518307 PMC: 7936137. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.021.


Effect of a Synbiotic Mix on Intestinal Structural Changes, and Typhimurium and Colonization in Broiler Chickens.

Villagran-de la Mora Z, Nuno K, Vazquez-Paulino O, Avalos H, Castro-Rosas J, Gomez-Aldapa C Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(10).

PMID: 31658619 PMC: 6826705. DOI: 10.3390/ani9100777.