» Articles » PMID: 20385986

Adherence is the Critical Factor for Achieving Molecular Responses in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Achieve Complete Cytogenetic Responses on Imatinib

Abstract

Purpose: There is a considerable variability in the level of molecular responses achieved with imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). These differences could result from variable therapy adherence.

Methods: Eighty-seven patients with chronic-phase CML treated with imatinib 400 mg/d for a median of 59.7 months (range, 25 to 104 months) who had achieved complete cytogenetic response had adherence monitored during a 3-month period by using a microelectronic monitoring device. Adherence was correlated with levels of molecular response. Other factors that could influence outcome were also analyzed.

Results: Median adherence rate was 98% (range, 24% to 104%). Twenty-three patients (26.4%) had adherence <or= 90%; in 12 of these patients (14%), adherence was <or= 80%. There was a strong correlation between adherence rate (<or= 90% or > 90%) and the 6-year probability of a 3-log reduction (also known as major molecular response [MMR]) in BCR-ABL1 transcripts (28.4% v 94.5%; P < .001) and also complete molecular response (CMR; 0% v 43.8%; P = .002). Multivariate analysis identified adherence (relative risk [RR], 11.7; P = .001) and expression of the molecular human organic cation transporter-1 (RR, 1.79; P = .038) as the only independent predictors for MMR. Adherence was the only independent predictor for CMR. No molecular responses were observed when adherence was <or= 80% (P < .001). Patients whose imatinib doses were increased had poor adherence (86.4%). In this latter population, adherence was the only independent predictor for inability to achieve an MMR (RR, 17.66; P = .006).

Conclusion: In patients with CML treated with imatinib for some years, poor adherence may be the predominant reason for inability to obtain adequate molecular responses.

Citing Articles

The impact of patient characteristics and social drivers of health factors on oral oncolytic adherence.

Uyehara N, Nguyen V, Yu S, Weng Y, Son A, Patneedi P J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025; 31(3):306-320.

PMID: 40021464 PMC: 11871160. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.3.306.


Challenges determining the best target duration of deep molecular response after which to attempt achieving therapy-free remission in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Gong X, Zhai X, Shen Q, Gale R, Chen J Leukemia. 2025; .

PMID: 40000844 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-025-02540-7.


Glaucoma Disease-Specific Adherence Measurement Tools Validated for Measuring Adherence to Glaucoma Medications: A Systematic Review.

Abaidoo B, Mashige K, Govender-Poonsamy P, Tagoe N, Essuman V, Adam S Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70427.

PMID: 39931261 PMC: 11808388. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70427.


Impact of Patient Personality on Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications: An Opportunity?.

Jafari M, Shahverdian A, Sadigh G, Van Etten R JMIR Cancer. 2024; 10:e57199.

PMID: 39475848 PMC: 11561440. DOI: 10.2196/57199.


Imatinib Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Belgium: Evidence from Real-World Data.

Michiels S, Tricas-Sauras S, Salaroli A, Bron D, Lewalle P, Vanschoenbeek K Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1991-2006.

PMID: 39345760 PMC: 11439344. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S472478.


References
1.
Cross N, Hughes T, Hochhaus A, Goldman J . International standardisation of quantitative real-time RT-PCR for BCR-ABL. Leuk Res. 2007; 32(3):505-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.03.031. View

2.
Partridge A, Wang P, Winer E, Avorn J . Nonadherence to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in women with primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(4):602-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.071. View

3.
Goldman J, Melo J . Chronic myeloid leukemia--advances in biology and new approaches to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(15):1451-64. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra020777. View

4.
Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J . Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(35):6041-51. PMC: 4979100. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0779. View

5.
Darkow T, Henk H, Thomas S, Feng W, Baladi J, Goldberg G . Treatment interruptions and non-adherence with imatinib and associated healthcare costs: a retrospective analysis among managed care patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007; 25(6):481-96. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200725060-00004. View