» Articles » PMID: 20379687

Hybrid Fixation in the Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy for Lower Jaw Advancement

Overview
Journal J Appl Oral Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Apr 10
PMID 20379687
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Miniplate and screw fixation has been widely used in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, but some issues remain unclear concerning its lack of rigidity when compared to Spiessl's bicortical technique. This paper demonstrates the hybrid fixation technique in a case report. A 34-year-old female patient underwent a double jaw surgery with counter-clockwise rotation of the mandible fixed using the hybrid fixation technique. The patient evolved well in the postoperative period and is still under follow up after 14 months, reporting satisfaction with the results and no significant deviation from the treatment plan up to now. No damage to tooth roots was done, maxillomandibular range of motion was within normality and regression of the inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia was observed bilaterally. The hybrid mandibular fixation is clearly visible in the panoramic and cephalometric control radiographs. It seems that the hybrid fixation can sum the advantages of both monocortical and bicortical techniques in lower jaw advancement, increasing fixation stability without significant damage to the mandibular articulation and the inferior alveolar nerve. A statistical investigation seems necessary to prove its efficacy.

Citing Articles

Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Altuncu F, Kazan D, Ozden B Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023; 28(6):e553-e561.

PMID: 37823299 PMC: 10635628. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25964.


The Anatomical Basis for Plate Fixation in BSSO to Minimize Condylar Torquing: A Comparative CT Study of Mandibular Advancement and Setback.

Zachariah T, Bharathi R, Ramanathan M, Parameswaran A J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021; 20(3):432-438.

PMID: 34408370 PMC: 8313615. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01564-7.


Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An study.

Sarkarat F, Ahmady A, Farahmand F, Fateh A, Kahali R, Nourani A Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020; 17(4):258-265.

PMID: 33282151 PMC: 7688040.


Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Chang L, Chen C, Jeng S, Chen Y, Hwang L, Lin T Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:8707389.

PMID: 32685538 PMC: 7320274. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8707389.


TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Valladares-Neto J, Cevidanes L, Rocha W, Almeida G, de Paiva J, Rino-Neto J J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22(1):2-14.

PMID: 24626243 PMC: 3908759. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130056.


References
1.
Arnett G . A redefinition of bilateral sagittal osteotomy (BSO) advancement relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104(5):506-15. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70076-Z. View

2.
Tharanon W . Comparison between the rigidity of bicortical screws and a miniplate for fixation of a mandibular setback after a simulated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 56(9):1055-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90255-5. View

3.
Van Sickels J, Jeter T, Theriot B . Management of an unfavorable lingual fracture during a sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43(10):808-9. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(85)90341-6. View

4.
Ellis 3rd E, Reynolds S, Carlson D . Stability of the mandible following advancement: a comparison of three postsurgical fixation techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94(1):38-49. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90449-0. View

5.
Tucker M, Ochs M . Use of rigid internal fixation for management of intraoperative complications of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1988; 3(2):71-80. View