» Articles » PMID: 20377875

The Total Deviation Index Estimated by Tolerance Intervals to Evaluate the Concordance of Measurement Devices

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2010 Apr 10
PMID 20377875
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In an agreement assay, it is of interest to evaluate the degree of agreement between the different methods (devices, instruments or observers) used to measure the same characteristic. We propose in this study a technical simplification for inference about the total deviation index (TDI) estimate to assess agreement between two devices of normally-distributed measurements and describe its utility to evaluate inter- and intra-rater agreement if more than one reading per subject is available for each device.

Methods: We propose to estimate the TDI by constructing a probability interval of the difference in paired measurements between devices, and thereafter, we derive a tolerance interval (TI) procedure as a natural way to make inferences about probability limit estimates. We also describe how the proposed method can be used to compute bounds of the coverage probability.

Results: The approach is illustrated in a real case example where the agreement between two instruments, a handle mercury sphygmomanometer device and an OMRON 711 automatic device, is assessed in a sample of 384 subjects where measures of systolic blood pressure were taken twice by each device. A simulation study procedure is implemented to evaluate and compare the accuracy of the approach to two already established methods, showing that the TI approximation produces accurate empirical confidence levels which are reasonably close to the nominal confidence level.

Conclusions: The method proposed is straightforward since the TDI estimate is derived directly from a probability interval of a normally-distributed variable in its original scale, without further transformations. Thereafter, a natural way of making inferences about this estimate is to derive the appropriate TI. Constructions of TI based on normal populations are implemented in most standard statistical packages, thus making it simpler for any practitioner to implement our proposal to assess agreement.

Citing Articles

Formal Assessment of Agreement and Similarity between an Open-Source and a Reference Industrial Device with an Application to a Low-Cost pH Logger.

Bataka E, Maletsika P, Nakas C Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(2).

PMID: 38257583 PMC: 10820125. DOI: 10.3390/s24020490.


A novel graphical evaluation of agreement.

Kim J, Lee J BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022; 22(1):51.

PMID: 35184729 PMC: 8858529. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01532-w.


Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: a tutorial for practitioners.

Parker R, Scott C, Inacio V, Stevens N BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):154.

PMID: 32532218 PMC: 7291585. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01022-x.


Comparison of 2D radiography and a semi-automatic CT-based 3D method for measuring change in dorsal angulation over time in distal radius fractures.

Christersson A, Nysjo J, Berglund L, Malmberg F, Sintorn I, Nystrom I Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45(6):763-9.

PMID: 26922189 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-016-2350-6.


Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement.

Henriques T, Antunes L, Bernardes J, Matias M, Sato D, Costa-Santos C BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:47.

PMID: 23522303 PMC: 3610282. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-47.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

3.
Carrasco J, Jover L . Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics. 2004; 59(4):849-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00099.x. View

4.
WESTLAKE W . Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials. Biometrics. 1976; 32(4):741-4. View

5.
Lin L . Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. Stat Med. 2000; 19(2):255-70. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000130)19:2<255::aid-sim293>3.0.co;2-8. View