» Articles » PMID: 20376624

Diagnostic Values of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Lesions

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2010 Apr 9
PMID 20376624
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Subscapularis (SSC) lesions are often underdiagnosed in the clinical routine. This study establishes and compares the diagnostic values of various clinical signs and diagnostic tests for lesions of the SSC tendon. Fifty consecutive patients who were scheduled for an arthroscopic subacromial or rotator cuff procedure were clinically evaluated using the lift-off test (LOT), the internal rotation lag sign (IRLS), the modified belly-press test (BPT) and the belly-off sign (BOS) preoperatively. A modified classification system according to Fox et al. (Type I-IV) was used to classify the SSC lesion during diagnostic arthroscopy. SSC tendon tears occurred with a prevalence of 30% (15 of 50). Five type I, six type II, three type IIIa and one type IIIb tears according to the modified classification system were found. Fifteen percent of the SSC tears were not predicted preoperatively by using all of the tests. In six cases (12%), the LOT and the IRLS could not be performed due to a painful restricted range of motion. The modified BPT and the BOS showed the greatest sensitivity (88 and 87%) followed by the IRLS (71%) and the LOT (40%). The BOS had the greatest specificity (91%) followed by the LOT (79%), mod. BPT (68%) and IRLS (45%). The BOS had the highest overall accuracy (90%). With the BOS and the modified BPT in particular, upper SSC lesions (type I and II) could be diagnosed preoperatively. A detailed physical exam using the currently available SSC tests allows diagnosing SSC lesions in the majority of cases preoperatively. However, some tears could not be predicted by preoperative assessment using all the tests.

Citing Articles

SUBSCAPULAR INJURY: PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, MRI AND ARTHROSCOPY.

Ribeiro H, Ferreira J, Dantas F, Ritta R Acta Ortop Bras. 2025; 33(1):e285935.

PMID: 39927324 PMC: 11801215. DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220253301e285935.


Muscle strength measurements reflecting the extent of complete subscapularis tears: reliability in patients with rotator cuff tears.

Sahara W, Takagi K, Tada S, Yamada D, Kiya H, Hanai H JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):109-115.

PMID: 39898229 PMC: 11784269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.201.


Swimmer arm-to-shoulder test for early differentiation between shoulder and cervical spine pathology in patients with shoulder pain.

Hamoud H, Aly H, Elmotaleb Y, Ghit M, Mosalam A, Nasrallah T BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):940.

PMID: 39574084 PMC: 11580640. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08013-9.


Activation patterns of rotator-cuff muscles from quantitative IVIM DWI after physical testing.

Marth A, Spinner G, von Deuster C, Sommer S, Sutter R, Nanz D Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):96.

PMID: 39186226 PMC: 11347545. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00487-5.


The Destiny of the Subscapularis Tendon after Arthroscopic Supraspinatus Repair.

Kim J, Kim Y, Cho S, Hong S, Lee H Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(4):594-601.

PMID: 39092311 PMC: 11262948. DOI: 10.4055/cios23389.


References
1.
Kato K . Innervation of the scapular muscles and its morphological significance in man. Anat Anz. 1989; 168(2):155-68. View

2.
Tokish J, Decker M, Ellis H, Torry M, Hawkins R . The belly-press test for the physical examination of the subscapularis muscle: electromyographic validation and comparison to the lift-off test. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12(5):427-30. DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00047-8. View

3.
Hertel R, Ballmer F, Lombert S, Gerber C . Lag signs in the diagnosis of rotator cuff rupture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5(4):307-13. DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(96)80058-9. View

4.
Townsend H, Jobe F, Pink M, Perry J . Electromyographic analysis of the glenohumeral muscles during a baseball rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(3):264-72. DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900309. View

5.
Burkhart S . Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (267):45-56. View