» Articles » PMID: 20375201

Reproductive Investment Within Inflorescences of Stylidium Armeria Varies with the Strength of Early Resource Commitment

Overview
Journal Ann Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Apr 9
PMID 20375201
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Resource allocation to flowers, fruits and seeds can vary greatly within an inflorescence. For example, distal fruits are often smaller and produce fewer and smaller fruits and seeds than more basal fruits. To assess the causes and functional significance of intra-inflorescence variation, pollen and resources were manipulated to test whether such patterns could be altered within racemes of Stylidum armeria, a perennial Australian herb.

Methods: Pollen and resource levels were manipulated over two flowering seasons. How the number of ovules, fertilized ovules and seeds, the probability of fruit set, and the biomass of floral and fruiting structures varied with their position on the raceme were analysed.

Key Results: Most plants showed a decline in ovule and seed number toward the distal positions on the raceme, but plants differed in their pattern of intra-inflorescence allocation: racemes with greater investment in basal fruits displayed a stronger trade-off with distal investment than did racemes that made smaller initial investments. This trade-off was (a) much stronger for ovule number than for seed number, (b) ameliorated but not erased by resource addition, and (c) exacerbated by resource reduction. There was large and seemingly erratic variation across fruit positions in ovule fertilization and seed set following both natural and supplemental pollination.

Conclusions: In S. armeria, allocation to reproductive traits within the inflorescence is influenced by dynamic trade-offs in resource allocation between early and late fruits, and may also be subject to inherent architectural effects. Large, unpredictable variation among fruits in fertilization success and seed set may influence the evolution of inflorescence size, ovule number and floral dimorphism.

Citing Articles

Flower Position and Clonal Integration Drive Intra-Individual Floral Trait Variation in Water-Hyacinth (, Pontederiaceae).

Demetrio G, Seixas L, Coelho F Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001882 PMC: 11852060. DOI: 10.3390/biology14020114.


The impact of an extreme climatic disturbance and different fertilization treatments on plant development, phenology, and yield of two cultivar groups of Solanum betaceum Cav.

Tandazo-Yunga J, Ruiz-Gonzalez M, Rojas J, Capa-Mora E, Prohens J, Alejandro J PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0190316.

PMID: 29287099 PMC: 5747456. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190316.


Variation in floral sex allocation, female success, and seed predation within racemiform synflorescence in the gynomonoecious Ligularia virgaurea (Asteraceae).

Zhang G, Xie T, Du G J Plant Res. 2012; 125(4):527-38.

PMID: 22270694 DOI: 10.1007/s10265-011-0466-2.


The relative importance of architecture and resource competition in allocation to pollen and ovule number within inflorescences of Hosta ventricosa varies with the resource pools.

Cao G, Xue L, Li Y, Pan K Ann Bot. 2011; 107(8):1413-9.

PMID: 21486925 PMC: 3101151. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr085.

References
1.
Burd M . OVULE PACKAGING IN STOCHASTIC POLLINATION AND FERTILIZATION ENVIRONMENTS. Evolution. 2017; 49(1):100-109. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05962.x. View

2.
Barrett S . The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3(4):274-84. DOI: 10.1038/nrg776. View

3.
Brookes R, Jesson L, Burd M . A test of simultaneous resource and pollen limitation in Stylidium armeria. New Phytol. 2008; 179(2):557-565. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02453.x. View

4.
Ortiz P, Berjano R, Talavera M, Arista M . The role of resources and architecture in modeling floral variability for the monoecious amphicarpic Emex spinosa (Polygonaceae). Am J Bot. 2011; 96(11):2062-73. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800417. View

5.
Diggle P, Miller J . Architectural effects mimic floral sexual dimorphism in Solanum (Solanaceae). Am J Bot. 2011; 91(12):2030-40. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.12.2030. View