» Articles » PMID: 20373073

The Accuracy of Sentinel Node Mapping According to T Stage in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Overview
Journal Gastric Cancer
Date 2010 Apr 8
PMID 20373073
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has been recently introduced to the field of gastric cancer. To the best of our knowledge, no study has dealt with the accuracy of SLN mapping according to the T stage of the primary tumor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate SLN status according to the T stage of the primary tumors.

Methods: Eighty patients with gastric cancer underwent SLN mapping with patent blue dye during gastric resection.

Results: Forty-seven patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy; 17 patients, proximal gastrectomy; 14, total gastrectomy; and 2, gastric stump resection. SLNs were stained in 61/80 patients (76.3%). The number of stained SLNs varied from 1 to 16 (mean, 3.3). Patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy had a mean of 3 stained SLNs, whereas patients undergoing distal subtotal gastrectomy had a mean of 2.8 stained SLNs. In 55/61 patients (90.2%) with stained SLNs a positive correlation was found between the presence of metastases and stained or non-stained SLNs. Ten out of 11 patients (90.9%) with T1 tumors (mean, 3.27 SLNs per patient) and 15/17 patients with T2 tumors (88.2%; mean, 3 SLNs per patient) had stained SLNs as compared to only 33/48 (68.8%) of patients with T3 tumors (mean, 3.3 SLNs per patient). The positive predictive value of the SLN mapping was 100%, the negative predictive value was 76.9%, and sensitivity was 85.4%.

Conclusion: While in T1 and T2 tumors sentinel node mapping may be of assistance in the decision-making process regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy (sensitivity, 100%; negative predictive value, 90%-100%), SLN mapping in patients with T3 tumors will be misleading in a third of the patients and should not be attempted.

Citing Articles

Indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence-guided surgery for gastric cancer: a narrative review.

ArmTan K, Kim Y J Minim Invasive Surg. 2024; 27(4):185-197.

PMID: 39675751 PMC: 11651914. DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.4.185.


Endoscopic fluorescent lymphography for gastric cancer.

Calcara C, Cocciolillo S, Marten Canavesio Y, Adamo V, Carenzi S, Lucci D World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 15(2):32-43.

PMID: 36925646 PMC: 10011894. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i2.32.


Tracers in Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Li Z, Li X, Zhu X, Ai S, Guan W, Liu S Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497216 PMC: 9741333. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235735.


A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer, an Optimization of Imaging Protocol for Tracer Mapping.

Huang Y, Pan M, Chen B World J Surg. 2021; 45(4):1126-1134.

PMID: 33389000 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05900-9.


Techniques and Current Role of Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Concept in Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Symeonidis D, Tepetes K Front Surg. 2019; 5:77.

PMID: 30723718 PMC: 6349703. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00077.


References
1.
Ichikura T, Chochi K, Sugasawa H, Yaguchi Y, Sakamoto N, Takahata R . Individualized surgery for early gastric cancer guided by sentinel node biopsy. Surgery. 2006; 139(4):501-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.005. View

2.
Thorn M . Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy: is the method applicable to patients with colorectal and gastric cancer?. Eur J Surg. 2000; 166(10):755-8. DOI: 10.1080/110241500447362. View

3.
Chung M, Ye W, Giuliano A . Role for sentinel lymph node dissection in the management of large (> or = 5 cm) invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001; 8(9):688-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0688-y. View

4.
Song X, Wang L, Chen W, Pan T, Zhu H, Xu J . Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2004; 187(2):270-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.013. View

5.
Lee J, Ryu K, Kim C, Kim S, Lee J, Kook M . Sentinel node biopsy using dye and isotope double tracers in early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13(9):1168-74. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9038-4. View