Assessment of Disability in Patients with Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview

Journal J Neurotrauma

Publisher Mary Ann Liebert

Specialties Emergency Medicine
Neurology

Date 2010 Apr 7

PMID 20367251

Citations 25

Authors

Julio C Furlan

Vanessa Noonan

Anoushka Singh

Michael G Fehlings

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Given the importance of accurately and reliably assessing disability in future clinical trials, which will test therapeutic strategies in acute spinal cord injury (SCI), we sought to appraise comprehensively studies that focused on the psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of all previously used outcome measures in the SCI population. The search strategy included Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Two reviewers independently assessed each study regarding eligibility, level of evidence (using Sackett's criteria), and quality. Of 363 abstracts captured in our search, 36 full articles fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight different outcome measures were used to assess disability in the SCI population, including Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Spinal cord Injury Measure (SCIM), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI), Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Timed Up & Go (TUG), 6-min walk test (6MWT), and 10-m walk test (10MWT). While 19 of 36 studies provided level-4 evidence, the remaining 17 articles were classified as level-2b evidence. Most of the instruments showed convergent construct validity in the SCI population, but criterion validity was not examined due to the lack a gold standard for assessment of disability. All instruments were tested in the rehabilitation and/or community setting, but only FIM was examined in the acute care setting. Based on our results of quality assessment, the SCIM has the most appropriate performance regarding the instrument's psychometric properties. Nonetheless, further investigations are required to confirm the adequate performance of the SCIM as a comprehensive measure of functional recovery in patients with SCI in rehabilitative care. The expert panel of the Spinal Cord Injury Solutions Network (SCISN) that participated in the modified Delphi process endorsed these conclusions.

Citing Articles

Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes after Cervical Spine Surgery: Narrative Review.

Sakaguchi T, Heyder A, Tanaka M, Uotani K, Omori T, Kodama Y J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336849 PMC: 11432758. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185363.

Translation and validation of the Chinese self-report version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch psychometric analysis and online application.

Xing H, Liu N, Li K, Cui G, Biering-Sorensen F Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 24:258-263.

PMID: 38623183 PMC: 11016810. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.029.

Efficacy of aquatic therapy in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Palladino L, Ruotolo I, Berardi A, Carlizza A, Galeoto G Spinal Cord. 2023; 61(6):317-322.

PMID: 36966260 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-023-00892-4.

Walking Ability Outcome Measures in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Sinovas-Alonso I, Gil-Agudo A, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Del-Ama A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(18).

PMID: 34574443 PMC: 8472084. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189517.

Effects on Outcomes of Hyperglycemia in the Hyperacute Stage after Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Furlan J Neurotrauma Rep. 2021; 2(1):14-24.

PMID: 34223544 PMC: 8240828. DOI: 10.1089/neur.2020.0042.

References

Itzkovich M, Tamir A, Philo O, Steinberg F, Ronen J, Spasser R . Reliability of the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82(4):267-72. DOI: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000057226.22271.44. View

Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee M . A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2006; 45(4):275-91. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101960. View

Guyatt G, Sullivan M, Thompson P, Fallen E, Pugsley S, Taylor D . The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985; 132(8):919-23. PMC: 1345899. View

Jacobs W, Fehlings M . The molecular basis of neural regeneration. Neurosurgery. 2003; 53(4):943-48. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000083592.74383.b1. View

Yavuz N, Tezyurek M, Akyuz M . A comparison of two functional tests in quadriplegia: the quadriplegia index of function and the functional independence measure. Spinal Cord. 1999; 36(12):832-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100726. View

Roomi J, Johnson M, Waters K, Yohannes A, Helm A, Connolly M . Respiratory rehabilitation, exercise capacity and quality of life in chronic airways disease in old age. Age Ageing. 1996; 25(1):12-6. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/25.1.12. View

Kucukdeveci A, Yavuzer G, Elhan A, Sonel B, Tennant A . Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15(3):311-9. DOI: 10.1191/026921501676877265. View

Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. View

Ditunno Jr J, Ditunno P, Graziani V, Scivoletto G, Bernardi M, Castellano V . Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38(4):234-43. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100993. View

10.

Marino R, Goin J . Development of a short-form Quadriplegia Index of Function scale. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37(4):289-96. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100772. View

11.

Lundgren-Nilsson A, Tennant A, Grimby G, Sunnerhagen K . Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the Functional Independence Measure in Scandinavia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:55. PMC: 1574291. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-55. View

12.

Grey N, Kennedy P . The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative study of clinician and self ratings. Paraplegia. 1993; 31(7):457-61. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1993.74. View

13.

Granger C, Albrecht G, Hamilton B . Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979; 60(4):145-54. View

14.

MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

15.

Smith M, Baer G . Achievement of simple mobility milestones after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(4):442-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90283-6. View

16.

Dodds T, Martin D, Stolov W, Deyo R . A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74(5):531-6. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-u. View

17.

Baptiste D, Fehlings M . Emerging drugs for spinal cord injury. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2008; 13(1):63-80. DOI: 10.1517/14728214.13.1.63. View

18.

de Bruin A, de Witte L, Stevens F, Diederiks J . Sickness Impact Profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 35(8):1003-14. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90240-q. View

19.

Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen K, Grimby G . Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005; 111(4):264-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00404.x. View

20.

Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, Ring H, Tamir A . The spinal cord independence measure (SCIM): sensitivity to functional changes in subgroups of spinal cord lesion patients. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39(2):97-100. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101118. View