» Articles » PMID: 20354591

Analysis of Multiple Manding Topographies During Functional Communication Training

Overview
Date 2010 Apr 1
PMID 20354591
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated the effects of reinforcing multiple manding topographies during functional communication training (FCT) to decrease problem behavior for three preschool-age children. During Phase 1, a functional analysis identified conditions that maintained problem behavior for each child. During Phase 2, the children's parents taught them to request positive reinforcers (attention or toys) via vocal manding, manual signing, or touching a picture/word card with or without a microswitch recording device. A non-concurrent multiple-baseline design across children was used to evaluate FCT outcomes. Results showed that problem behavior decreased for all three children. Results also indicated that the children initially used multiple manding topographies but displayed a preference for vocal manding over time.

Citing Articles

A Practitioner's Guide for Selecting Functional Communication Responses.

Houck E, Dracobly J, Baak S Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(1):65-75.

PMID: 37006421 PMC: 10050301. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-022-00705-9.


Relapse and its mitigation: Toward behavioral inoculation.

Kimball R, Greer B, Fuhrman A, Lambert J J Appl Behav Anal. 2023; 56(2):282-301.

PMID: 36715533 PMC: 10121865. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.971.


A Systematic Review of Caregiver-Implemented Functional Analyses.

Germansky S, Reichow B, Martin M, Snyder P Behav Anal Pract. 2020; 13(3):698-713.

PMID: 32953398 PMC: 7471228. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-019-00404-y.


A Preliminary Evaluation of Functional Communication Training Effectiveness and Language Preference When Spanish and English are Manipulated.

Dalmau Y, Wacker D, Harding J, Berg W, Schieltz K, Lee J J Behav Educ. 2013; 20(4):233-251.

PMID: 23761722 PMC: 3677033. DOI: 10.1007/s10864-011-9131-z.


Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

Smith J Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(4):510-50.

PMID: 22845874 PMC: 3652808. DOI: 10.1037/a0029312.


References
1.
Northup J, Wacker D, Berg W, Kelly L, Sasso G, DeRaad A . The treatment of severe behavior problems in school settings using a technical assistance model. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(1):33-47. PMC: 1297775. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-33. View

2.
Richman D, Wacker D, Winborn L . Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001; 34(1):73-6. PMC: 1284300. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-73. View

3.
Lalli J, Mace F . Identification and modification of a response-class hierarchy. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995; 28(4):551-9. PMC: 1279859. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-551. View

4.
Winborn L, Wacker D, Richman D, Asmus J, Geier D . Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002; 35(3):295-8. PMC: 1284389. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-295. View

5.
Kelley M, Lerman D, Van Camp C . The effects of competing reinforcement schedules on the acquisition of functional communication. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002; 35(1):59-63. PMC: 1284360. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-59. View