» Articles » PMID: 20353458

A Randomised Controlled Trial of 300 Versus 225 IU Recombinant FSH for Ovarian Stimulation in Predicted Normal Responders by Antral Follicle Count

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2010 Apr 1
PMID 20353458
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that among women predicted to have a normal ovarian response, ovarian stimulation using 300 IU follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) results in the retrieval of more mature oocytes than 225 IU during in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment.

Design: Prospective randomised controlled study.

Setting: University-based assisted conception unit.

Population: A cohort of 131 women predicted to have a normal ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation, based on antral follicle count.

Methods: Subjects undergoing their first cycle of IVF/ICSI were randomised to receive a fixed daily dose of 300 (experimental arm) or 225 IU (control arm) of recombinant FSH (Gonal-F).

Main Outcome Measures: Number of mature oocytes retrieved and live birth rates.

Results: The number (mean +/- standard deviation) of mature oocytes retrieved (8.2 +/- 5.0 versus 9.0 +/- 4.8, for 300 and 225 IU, respectively; P = 0.34) was similar in each group. There were no differences between the 300- and 225 IU arms in live birth rates (31 versus 41%, respectively; P = 0.25), cycle cancellations resulting from insufficient ovarian response (0 versus 6.1%, respectively; P = 0.12), and prevalence of moderate (3.1 versus 3.0, respectively; P = 1.0) and severe (0 versus 1.5%, respectively; P = 1.0) ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Conclusions: The use of a higher daily dose of 300 IU of recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation does not improve the number of mature oocytes retrieved, or live birth rates, among women with a predicted normal response during conventional IVF/ICSI.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a gonadotropin dose selection model for optimized ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Schouten N, Wang R, Torrance H, Van Tilborg T, Bastu E, Bergh C Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 31(2):116-132.

PMID: 39707165 PMC: 11879166. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae032.


Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Ngwenya O, Lensen S, Vail A, Mol B, Broekmans F, Wilkinson J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD012693.

PMID: 38174816 PMC: 10765476. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012693.pub3.


Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve.

Jia Z, Li Y, Li R, Hou S, Xia Q, Yang K Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1068141.

PMID: 36742378 PMC: 9895085. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1068141.


Quantitative approaches in clinical reproductive endocrinology.

Voliotis M, Hanassab S, Abbara A, Heinis T, Dhillo W, Tsaneva-Atanasova K Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2023; 27:100421.

PMID: 36643692 PMC: 9831018. DOI: 10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100421.


What Does Unexpected Suboptimal Response During Ovarian Stimulation Suggest, an Overlooked Group?.

Wang B, Liu W, Liu Y, Zhang W, Ren C, Guan Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 12:795254.

PMID: 35002973 PMC: 8727549. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.795254.