» Articles » PMID: 20352646

Treatment Engagement As a Predictor of Premature Treatment Termination and Treatment Outcome in a Correctional Outpatient Sample

Overview
Date 2010 Mar 31
PMID 20352646
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is widely assumed that the outcome of correctional treatment largely depends on the patient's treatment engagement; however, evidence for this notion is scarce.

Aim: In this study, the Treatment Engagement Rating scale (TER) was used to investigate the relationship of a patient's treatment engagement with premature treatment termination and treatment outcome, defined as reduction of the risk of reoffending.

Method: Employing a prospective design, this study addressed the relationship of the behavioural treatment engagement of correctional outpatients (N = 138) with treatment non-completion and treatment outcome, respectively.

Results: Treatment engagement as measured by the TER emerged as an accurate predictor of treatment non-completion (area under the curve = 0.76; odds ratio = 4.1) and was also significantly correlated with treatment outcome (rho = 0.41). The prediction was more accurate for sex offenders than for violent offenders, for expulsion from the treatment than for dropout, and when treatment engagement was assessed closer to the end of the treatment.

Conclusions: The study provides evidence that the outcome of correctional treatment depends to a substantial degree on the behavioural efforts that the patients make for the treatment. Periodic assessment of treatment engagement in correctional treatment facilities would be useful, and the TER seems to be a practical, reliable and valid instrument for this purpose.

Citing Articles

Using Active and Passive Smartphone Data to Enhance Adolescents' Emotional Awareness in Forensic Outpatient Setting: A Qualitative Feasibility and Usability Study.

Leijse M, van Dam L, Jambroes T, Timmerman A, Popma A JMIR Form Res. 2025; 8:e53613.

PMID: 39753211 PMC: 11729785. DOI: 10.2196/53613.


Combining Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Substances in Detained Youth.

van der Baan H, Collot DEscury-Koenigs A, Grasman R, Schippers G, Wiers R JAACAP Open. 2024; 2(4):301-310.

PMID: 39697389 PMC: 11650685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.08.003.


Self-perceived views on offender rehabilitation in detained adolescent boys: a qualitative analysis in the context of the good lives model.

Serie C, de Ruiter C, Pleysier S, Put J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1153093.

PMID: 37275692 PMC: 10235481. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153093.


Motivations for Treatment Engagement in a Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Program: A Qualitative Study.

Dillon P, Kedia S, Isehunwa O, Sharma M Subst Abuse. 2020; 14:1178221820940682.

PMID: 32922019 PMC: 7457698. DOI: 10.1177/1178221820940682.


Testing the Integral Model of treatment motivation in outpatients with severe mental illness.

Jochems E, Duivenvoorden H, van Dam A, Mulder C, van der Feltz-Cornelis C Motiv Emot. 2018; 42(6):816-830.

PMID: 30416227 PMC: 6208637. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-018-9708-0.