» Articles » PMID: 20350786

A Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Early PSA Test-based Variables Following External Beam Radiotherapy, with or Without Preceding Androgen Deprivation: Analysis of Data from the TROG 96.01 Randomized Trial

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2010 Mar 31
PMID 20350786
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We sought to compare the prognostic value of early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test-based variables for the 802 eligible patients treated in the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.01 randomized trial.

Methods And Materials: Patients in this trial had T2b, T2c, T3, and T4 N0 prostate cancer and were randomized to 0, 3, or 6 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) prior to and during radiation treatment at 66 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The early PSA test-based variables evaluated were the pretreatment initial PSA (iPSA) value, PSA values at 2 and 4 months into NADT, the PSA nadir (nPSA) value after radiation in all patients, and PSA response signatures in men receiving radiation. Comparisons of endpoints were made using Cox models of local progression-free survival, distant failure-free survival, biochemical failure-free survival, and prostate cancer-specific survival.

Results: The nPSA value was a powerful predictor of all endpoints regardless of whether NADT was given before radiation. PSA response signatures also predicted all endpoints in men treated by radiation alone. iPSA and PSA results at 2 and 4 months into NADT predicted biochemical failure-free survival but not any of the clinical endpoints. nPSA values correlated with those of iPSA, Gleason grade, and T stage and were significantly higher in men receiving radiation alone than in those receiving NADT.

Conclusions: The postradiation nPSA value is the strongest prognostic indicator of all early PSA-based variables. However, its use as a surrogate endpoint needs to take into account its dependence on pretreatment variables and treatment method.

Citing Articles

Early biochemical outcomes following neoadjuvant/adjuvant relugolix with stereotactic body radiation therapy for intermediate to high risk prostate cancer.

Gallagher L, Xiao J, Hsueh J, Shah S, Danner M, Zwart A Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1289249.

PMID: 37916156 PMC: 10616590. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1289249.


Long-Term Dynamics of Three Dimensional Telomere Profiles in Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation and Radiation Therapy.

Wark L, Quon H, Ong A, Drachenberg D, Rangel-Pozzo A, Mai S Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(8).

PMID: 31416141 PMC: 6721586. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081165.


Prostate-Specific Antigen After Neoadjuvant Androgen Suppression in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Short-Term Androgen Suppression and External Beam Radiation Therapy: Pooled Analysis of Four NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group....

Hallemeier C, Zhang P, Pisansky T, Hanks G, McGowan D, Roach 3rd M Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 104(5):1057-1065.

PMID: 30959123 PMC: 6646073. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.049.


Time Interval to Biochemical Failure as a Surrogate End Point in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Randomized Trial NRG/RTOG 9202.

Dignam J, Hamstra D, Lepor H, Grignon D, Brereton H, Currey A J Clin Oncol. 2018; 37(3):213-221.

PMID: 30526194 PMC: 6338393. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.00154.


Association of Nadir Prostate-specific Antigen >0.5 ng/mL after Dose-escalated External Beam Radiation with Prostate Cancer-specific Endpoints.

Sheth N, Youssef I, Osborn V, Lee A, Safdieh J, Schreiber D Cureus. 2018; 10(6):e2790.

PMID: 30112266 PMC: 6089484. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2790.