» Articles » PMID: 20350326

Evidence for Perinatal and Child Health Care Guidelines in Crisis Settings: Can Cochrane Help?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2010 Mar 31
PMID 20350326
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is important that healthcare provided in crisis settings is based on the best available research evidence. We reviewed guidelines for child and perinatal health care in crisis situations to determine whether they were based on research evidence, whether Cochrane systematic reviews were available in the clinical areas addressed by these guidelines and whether summaries of these reviews were provided in Evidence Aid.

Methods: Broad internet searches were undertaken to identify relevant guidelines. Guidelines were appraised using AGREE and the clinical areas that were relevant to perinatal or child health were extracted. We searched The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify potentially relevant reviews. For each review we determined how many trials were included, and how many were conducted in resource-limited settings.

Results: Six guidelines met selection criteria. None of the included guidelines were clearly based on research evidence. 198 Cochrane reviews were potentially relevant to the guidelines. These reviews predominantly addressed nutrient supplementation, breastfeeding, malaria, maternal hypertension, premature labour and prevention of HIV transmission. Most reviews included studies from developing settings. However for large portions of the guidelines, particularly health services delivery, there were no relevant reviews. Only 18 (9.1%) reviews have summaries in Evidence Aid.

Conclusions: We did not identify any evidence-based guidelines for perinatal and child health care in disaster settings. We found many Cochrane reviews that could contribute to the evidence-base supporting future guidelines. However there are important issues to be addressed in terms of the relevance of the available reviews and increasing the number of reviews addressing health care delivery.

Citing Articles

Informing infant and young child feeding programming in humanitarian emergencies: An evidence map of reviews including low and middle income countries.

Prudhon C, Benelli P, Maclaine A, Harrigan P, Frize J Matern Child Nutr. 2017; 14(1).

PMID: 28670790 PMC: 6865874. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12457.


'It is me who eats, to nourish him': a mixed-method study of breastfeeding in post-earthquake Haiti.

Dornemann J, Kelly A Matern Child Nutr. 2012; 9(1):74-89.

PMID: 22784020 PMC: 6860539. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00428.x.

References
1.
Chongsomchai C, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M . Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta in vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (2):CD004904. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004904.pub2. View

2.
Flint A, New K, Davies M . Cup feeding versus other forms of supplemental enteral feeding for newborn infants unable to fully breastfeed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2):CD005092. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005092.pub2. View

3.
Weller S, Davis K . Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; (1):CD003255. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003255. View

4.
Gulmezoglu A, Hofmeyr G . Betamimetics for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; (4):CD000036. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000036. View

5.
Mahomed K, Bhutta Z, Middleton P . Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2):CD000230. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000230.pub3. View