» Articles » PMID: 20346033

Management of Prostate Cancer in Older Men: Recommendations of a Working Group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Mar 30
PMID 20346033
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in men and predominantly affects older men (aged >or=70 years). The median age at diagnosis is 68 years; overall, two-thirds of prostate cancer-related deaths occur in men aged >or=75 years. With the exponential ageing of the population and the increasing life-expectancy in developed countries, the burden of prostate cancer is expected to increase dramatically in the future. To date, no specific guidelines on the management of prostate cancer in older men have been published. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) conducted a systematic bibliographic search based on screening, diagnostic procedures and treatment options for localized and advanced prostate cancer, to develop a proposal for recommendations that should provide the highest standard of care for older men with prostate cancer. The consensus of the SIOG Prostate Cancer Task Force is that older men with prostate cancer should be managed according to their individual health status, which is mainly driven by the severity of associated comorbid conditions, and not according to chronological age. Existing international recommendations (European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Urological Association) are the backbone for localized and advanced prostate cancer treatment, but need to be adapted to patient health status. Based on a rapid and simple evaluation, patients can be classified into four different groups: 1, 'Healthy' patients (controlled comorbidity, fully independent in daily living activities, no malnutrition) should receive the same treatment as younger patients; 2, 'Vulnerable' patients (reversible impairment) should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; 3, 'Frail' patients (irreversible impairment) should receive adapted treatment; 4, Patients who are 'too sick' with 'terminal illness' should receive only symptomatic palliative treatment.

Citing Articles

Prostate Cancer: Burden and Correlation with Prostate Specific Antigen Among Screened African Men in Tanzania.

Ngowi B, Mremi A, Seif M, Kyara Y, Mteta V, Bright F Res Rep Urol. 2024; 16:315-325.

PMID: 39605854 PMC: 11598594. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S472472.


Comprehensive geriatric assessment guided radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer-exploratory results on nonoperative cohort of a multicenter prospective study.

Yang Y, Tang Y, Li N, Tang Y, Cheng Y, Yang L Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241296386.

PMID: 39563720 PMC: 11574900. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241296386.


Self-reported health, function, and use of health care services in older prostate cancer survivors compared to matched controls: a cross-sectional study.

Sletten R, Slaaen M, Oldervoll L, Skjellegrind H, Saltyte Benth J, Astrom L J Cancer Surviv. 2024; .

PMID: 39289307 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01670-8.


Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in older patients with rectal cancer guided by comprehensive geriatric assessment within a multidisciplinary team-a multicenter phase II trial.

Liu W, Tang Y, Li N, Tang Y, Cheng Y, Yang L BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):442.

PMID: 38773457 PMC: 11106876. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05046-6.


An early-onset specific polygenic risk score optimizes age-based risk estimate and stratification of prostate cancer: population-based cohort study.

Cheng Y, Wu L, Xin J, Ben S, Chen S, Li H J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):366.

PMID: 38632662 PMC: 11025178. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05190-y.


References
1.
Extermann M . Measuring comorbidity in older cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 36(4):453-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00319-6. View

2.
Albertsen P, Hanley J, Fine J . 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005; 293(17):2095-101. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2095. View

3.
LINN B, Linn M, GUREL L . Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1968; 16(5):622-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1968.tb02103.x. View

4.
Zeliadt S, Potosky A, Penson D, Etzioni R . Survival benefit associated with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy for high- and low-risk patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66(2):395-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.048. View

5.
Studer U, Whelan P, Albrecht W, Casselman J, de Reijke T, Hauri D . Immediate or deferred androgen deprivation for patients with prostate cancer not suitable for local treatment with curative intent: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 30891. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(12):1868-76. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7423. View