» Articles » PMID: 20345742

Influence of Cusp Inclination on Stress Distribution in Implant-supported Prostheses. A Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Journal J Prosthodont
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Mar 30
PMID 20345742
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses by 3D finite element method.

Materials And Methods: Three-dimensional models were created to simulate a mandibular bone section with an implant (3.75 mm diameter x 10 mm length) and crown by means of a 3D scanner and 3D CAD software. A screw-retained single crown was simulated using three cusp inclinations (10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees). The 3D models (model 10d, model 20d, and model 30d) were transferred to the finite element program NeiNastran 9.0 to generate a mesh and perform the stress analysis. An oblique load of 200 N was applied on the internal vestibular face of the metal ceramic crown.

Results: The results were visualized by means of von Mises stress maps. Maximum stress concentration was located at the point of application. The implant showed higher stress values in model 30d (160.68 MPa). Cortical bone showed higher stress values in model 10d (28.23 MPa).

Conclusion: Stresses on the implant and implant/abutment interface increased with increasing cusp inclination, and stresses on the cortical bone decreased with increasing cusp inclination.

Citing Articles

Three-year observations on the effect of different cusp inclinations on the restoration of short maxillary first molar implants: A randomized controlled trial.

Cheng Y, Xiao C, Zhu Y, Chen Q, Zhang L, Zhang Y Front Physiol. 2023; 13:992800.

PMID: 36685182 PMC: 9845769. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.992800.


Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: A 3D finite element analysis study.

Acharya P, Patel V, Duseja S, Chauhan V J Adv Prosthodont. 2021; 13(2):79-88.

PMID: 34025956 PMC: 8110741. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.2.79.


Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses.

Yegin E, Atala M Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6(1):69.

PMID: 33106916 PMC: 7588579. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00267-x.


[Reliability study in the measurement of the cusp inclination angle of a chairside digital model].

Xinggang L, Xiaoxian C Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018; 36(1):56-59.

PMID: 29594997 PMC: 7030176. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.01.011.


Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis.

Lee J, Kweon H, Choi S, Kim Y J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017; 46(6):396-404.

PMID: 28050317 PMC: 5200865. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396.