Phosphate Removal by Anion Binding on Functionalized Nanoporous Sorbents
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Phosphate was captured from aqueous solutions by cationic metal-EDA complexes anchored inside mesoporous silica MCM-41 supports (Cu(II)-EDA-SAMMS and Fe(III)-EDA-SAMMS). Fe-EDA-SAMMS was more effective at capturing phosphate than the Cu-EDA-SAMMS and was further studied for matrix effects (e.g., pH, ionic strength, and competing anions) and sorption performance (e.g., capacity and rate). The adsorption of phosphate was highly pH dependent; it increased with increasing pH from 1.0 to 6.5, and decreased above pH 6.5. The adsorption was affected by high ionic strength (0.1 M of NaCl). In the presence of 1000-fold molar excess of chloride and nitrate anions, phosphate removal by Fe-EDA-SAMMS was not affected. Slight, moderate and large impacts were seen with bicarbonate, sulfate, and citrate anions, respectively. The phosphate adsorption data on Fe-EDA-SAMMS agreed well with the Langmuir model with the estimated maximum capacity of 43.3 mg/g. The material displayed rapid sorption rate (99% of phosphate removal within 1 min) and lowering the phosphate content to approximately 10 microg/L of phosphorus, which is lower than the EPA's established freshwater contaminant level for phosphorus (20 microg/L).
Cheng J, Xu C, Sun Y, Yu Q, Ding S, Wang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13192.
PMID: 38851826 PMC: 11162473. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64129-x.
Gencer A, Uysal Karatas B, Topel O, Kiraz N Turk J Chem. 2024; 48(1):50-64.
PMID: 38544887 PMC: 10965177. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0527.3638.
Vyas G, Bhatt S, Paul P RSC Adv. 2022; 9(59):34102-34113.
PMID: 35530005 PMC: 9073610. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra07042g.
Madri R, Tiwari D, Sinha I RSC Adv. 2022; 11(19):11204-11214.
PMID: 35423642 PMC: 8695815. DOI: 10.1039/d0ra07425j.
Zhang Z, Tao H, Cao Q, Li L, Xu S, Li Y Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022; 414(11):3507-3515.
PMID: 35195742 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-03973-0.