» Articles » PMID: 20336508

Temperature and PH Affect the Production of Bacterial Biofilm

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2010 Mar 26
PMID 20336508
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of different cultivation temperatures (30 and 37 degrees C) and pH of the media (5.5, 7.5, 8.5) on the biofilm production was compared in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Vibrio cholerae non-O1 and O1 using the crystal-violet test for estimation of quantitative production of the biofilm. Decrease (46.4-98.4 %) in the biofilm production was observed at 37 degrees C in 8 of the tested strains (P. aeruginosa three strains, K pneumoniae two, V. cholerae non-O1 two, and V. cholerae O1 one strain) compared with the production at 30 degrees C. On the other hand, five strains (P. aeruginosa 1, K. pneumoniae 3, V. cholerae non-O1 1) exhibited under these conditions a higher biofilm production (103-143 %). However, this difference was not significant (p = 0.196). Increased pH lead to a higher biofilm production using all media tested. In P. aeruginosa the biofilm production at pH 8.5 was 139-244 %, at pH 7.5 136-164 % in comparison with pH 5.5. Similarly, in K. pneumoniae the biofilm production increased to 151-319 % at pH 8.5 while with the drop of pH to 7.5 the biofilm production was 113-177 % compared with pH 5.5. In V. cholerae non-O1 and O1 the biofilm production reached 204-329 % at pH 8.5, and 123-316 % at pH 7.5 (compared with the production at pH 5.5). An increase in biofilm production represented an average of 169 % (p = 0.001) at pH change from 5.5 to 7.5, with the rise of pH from 5.5 to 8.5 caused an average difference of 229 % (p = 0.001).

Citing Articles

Biofilm-mediated bioremediation of xenobiotics and heavy metals: a comprehensive review of microbial ecology, molecular mechanisms, and emerging biotechnological applications.

Sarkar A, Bhattacharjee S 3 Biotech. 2025; 15(4):78.

PMID: 40060289 PMC: 11889332. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-025-04252-2.


The Acid-Buffered Engineered Gel Promotes In Vitro Cutaneous Healing and Fights Resistant Bacteria in Wounds.

Abid F, Virgo E, Kennewell T, Khetan R, Haidari H, Kopecki Z Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39598606 PMC: 11597482. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16111484.


Phage against the Machine: The SIE-ence of Superinfection Exclusion.

Bucher M, Czyz D Viruses. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39339825 PMC: 11436027. DOI: 10.3390/v16091348.


The pH-Insensitive Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities of the Frog Skin Derived Peptide Esc(1-21): Promising Features for Novel Anti-Infective Drugs.

Loffredo M, Cappiello F, Cappella G, Capuozzo E, Torrini L, Diaco F Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39200001 PMC: 11350779. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13080701.


Arcopilins: A New Family of Biofilm Disruptors from the Soil Fungus .

Charria-Giron E, Zeng H, Gorelik T, Pahl A, Truong K, Schrey H J Med Chem. 2024; 67(17):15029-15040.

PMID: 39141525 PMC: 11403616. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00585.


References
1.
Costerton J, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell D, Korber D, Lappin-Scott H . Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995; 49:711-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431. View

2.
OToole G, Kolter R . Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol. 1998; 28(3):449-61. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00797.x. View

3.
Heyde M, Portalier R . Regulation of major outer membrane porin proteins of Escherichia coli K 12 by pH. Mol Gen Genet. 1987; 208(3):511-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328148. View

4.
Bonafonte M, Solano C, Sesma B, Alvarez M, Montuenga L, Gamazo C . The relationship between glycogen synthesis, biofilm formation and virulence in salmonella enteritidis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000; 191(1):31-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09315.x. View

5.
Stepanovic S, Cirkovic I, Ranin L, Svabic-Vlahovic M . Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004; 38(5):428-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01513.x. View