» Articles » PMID: 2033356

The Importance of the Orientation of the Electrode Plates in Recording the External Anal Sphincter EMG by Non-invasive Anal Plug Electrodes

Overview
Date 1991 Feb 1
PMID 2033356
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two non-invasive anal plug electrodes of similar size have been compared, one with the electrode plates orientated circularly in the anal canal and the other with the plates in the long axis of the anal canal. There was a significant increase in the amplitude in the EMG signals recorded at rest and during squeeze from the external anal sphincter with a longitudinally placed electrode in 117 patients. Inappropriate contraction of the external anal sphincter when straining at stool was more readily detected using the longitudinal electrode in 52 patients investigated for intractable constipation. The longitudinal electrode detected the amplitude of the response to the elicitation of a pudeno-anal reflex more readily than the circular electrode. When in 12 of the 117 the pudeno-anal reflex EMG signal was either absent or not detected with the circumferential plug electrode, the longitudinal electrode detected the presence of a low amplitude response in 11 of these. When the non-invasive longitudinal electrode was compared to invasive fine wire stainless steel electrodes, a correlation was found for external anal sphincter resting EMG (r = 0.99, p less than 0.01), voluntary squeeze EMG (r = 0.99, p less than 0.001) and strain EMG (r = 0.91, p less than 0.01). The longitudinal anal plug electrode thus facilitates surface acquisition of EMG activity.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Strategy and Tools for Identifying Defecatory Disorders.

Bharucha A, Coss-Adame E Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022; 51(1):39-53.

PMID: 35135664 PMC: 8829054. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.10.002.


Constipation and obstructed defecation.

Steele S, Mellgren A Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009; 20(2):110-7.

PMID: 20011385 PMC: 2780173. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-977489.


Relations between pregnancy-related low back pain, pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Pool-Goudzwaard A, Slieker ten Hove M, Vierhout M, Mulder P, Pool J, Snijders C Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005; 16(6):468-74.

PMID: 15803285 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1292-7.


Outlet obstruction constipation (anismus) managed by biofeedback.

Kawimbe B, Papachrysostomou M, Binnie N, Clare N, Smith A Gut. 1991; 32(10):1175-9.

PMID: 1955173 PMC: 1379381. DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.10.1175.


Relation between electromyography and anal manometry of the external anal sphincter.

Papachrysostomou M, Binnie N, Smith A Gut. 1992; 33(5):718.

PMID: 1612494 PMC: 1379310. DOI: 10.1136/gut.33.5.718.


References
1.
Hopkinson B, LIGHTWOOD R . Electrical treatment of anal incontinence. Lancet. 1966; 1(7432):297-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)90644-1. View

2.
Bartolo D, Jarratt J, Read N . The use of conventional electromyography to assess external sphincter neuropathy in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983; 46(12):1115-8. PMC: 491777. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.46.12.1115. View

3.
Eriksen B, Bergmann S, MJOLNEROD O . Effect of anal electrostimulation with the 'Incontan' device in women with urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987; 94(2):147-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02342.x. View

4.
Womack N, Williams N, Holmfield J, Morrison J, Simpkins K . New method for the dynamic assessment of anorectal function in constipation. Br J Surg. 1985; 72(12):994-8. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800721221. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View