Endosonographic Radial Tumor Thickness After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy to Predict Response and Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: a Prospective Multicenter Phase Ll Study by the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer...
Overview
Pharmacology
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: EUS response assessment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is limited by disintegration of the involved anatomic structures.
Objective: Predictive and prognostic values of a prospectively defined maximum tumor thickness (MTT).
Design: Prospective open-label phase ll study (SAKK 75/02).
Setting: Multicenter, nationwide.
Patients: Of 66 patients with primary CRT, 56 underwent en bloc esophagectomy.
Interventions: EUS-measured MTT before and 2-5 weeks after CRT (yMTT).
Main Outcome Measurements: Cutoffs: (1) absolute thickness (yMTT) after CRT < or = 6 mm; (2) relative reduction compared with baseline (ratio yMTT/MTT) < or = 50%. Correlation between EUS measurements and histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) and overall survival (OS).
Results: Sixteen of 56 patients were not included for EUS evaluation (10 severe stenosis, 5 MTT not measured, 1 intolerance to second EUS). Characteristics (n = 40) were as follow: median age, 60 years; squamous cell carcinoma, 42%; and adenocarcinoma (AC), 58%. Initial stage was: 10 T2N1, 3 T3N0, 26 T3N1, 1 T3Nx; 14 of 23 AC Siewert type 1. Wilcoxon rank sum test showed significant correlation of TRG1 with yMTT < or = 6 mm (P = .008) and yMTT/MTT < or = 50% (P = .003). The effect of yMTT on TRG1 was significant (P = .0193; odds ratio, 0.687 [95% CI, 0.502-0.941]). The predefined cutoff of < or = 6 mm for yMTT was predictive for TRG1 (P = .0037; Fisher exact test). After a median follow-up of 28.6 months, there was a clear trend for benefit in OS with yMTT < or = 6 mm and yMTT/MTT < or = 50%.
Limitations: Small sample size.
Conclusion: In a multicenter setting, MTT measured by EUS after CRT was highly predictive for response and showed a clear trend for predicting survival.
Chen X, Chen X, Bao Y, Zhang W, Jiang L, Zhu J Endosc Ultrasound. 2023; 12(4):369-376.
PMID: 37795352 PMC: 10547243. DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000008.
Chen L, Liu X, Zhang W, Qin S, Wang Y, Lin J Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(12):666.
PMID: 35845508 PMC: 9279805. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-2418.
Wang R, Zhou X, Liu T, Lin S, Wang Y, Deng X Front Oncol. 2022; 12:898383.
PMID: 35747837 PMC: 9209710. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898383.
Yonemoto S, Uesato M, Nakano A, Murakami K, Toyozumi T, Maruyama T World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 14(5):320-334.
PMID: 35719903 PMC: 9157697. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.320.
Zhang X, Eyck B, Yang Y, Liu J, Chao Y, Hou M BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):194.
PMID: 32143580 PMC: 7060643. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6669-y.