» Articles » PMID: 20303143

Cultural Conservatism and Variability in the Acheulian Sequence of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov

Overview
Journal J Hum Evol
Specialties Biology
Social Sciences
Date 2010 Mar 23
PMID 20303143
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Acheulian Technocomplex exhibits two phenomena: variability and conservatism. Variability is expressed in the composition and frequencies of tool types, particularly in the varying frequencies of bifaces (handaxes and cleavers). Conservatism is expressed in the continuous presence of bifaces along an immense time trajectory. The site of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov (GBY) offers a unique opportunity to study aspects of variability and conservatism as a result of its long cultural-stratigraphic sequence containing superimposed lithic assemblages. This study explores aspects of variability and conservatism within the Acheulian lithic assemblages of GBY, with emphasis placed on the bifacial tools. While variability has been studied through a comparison of typological frequencies in a series of assemblages from the site, evidence for conservatism was examined in the production modes expressed by the reduction sequence of the bifaces. We demonstrate that while pronounced typological variability is observed among the GBY assemblages, they were all manufactured by the same technology. The technology, size, and morphology of the bifaces throughout the entire stratigraphic sequence of GBY reflect the strong conservatism of their makers. We conclude that the biface frequency cannot be considered as a chrono/cultural marker that might otherwise allow us to distinguish between different phases within the Acheulian. The variability observed within the assemblages is explained as a result of different activities, tasks, and functions, which were carried out at specific localities along the shores of the paleo-Hula Lake in the early Middle Pleistocene.

Citing Articles

Earliest Prepared core technology in Eurasia from Nihewan (China): Implications for early human abilities and dispersals in East Asia.

Ma D, Pei S, Xie F, Ye Z, Wang F, Xu J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(11):e2313123121.

PMID: 38437546 PMC: 10945746. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313123121.


A biface production older than 600 ka ago at Notarchirico (Southern Italy) contribution to understanding early Acheulean cognition and skills in Europe.

Moncel M, Santagata C, Pereira A, Nomade S, Bahain J, Voinchet P PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0218591.

PMID: 31557192 PMC: 6762110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218591.


AGMT3-D: A software for 3-D landmarks-based geometric morphometric shape analysis of archaeological artifacts.

Herzlinger G, Grosman L PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0207890.

PMID: 30458049 PMC: 6245792. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207890.


Acheulean technology and landscape use at Dawadmi, central Arabia.

Shipton C, Blinkhorn J, Breeze P, Cuthbertson P, Drake N, Groucutt H PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0200497.

PMID: 30052630 PMC: 6063418. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200497.


The Victoria West: earliest prepared core technology in the Acheulean at Canteen Kopje and implications for the cognitive evolution of early hominids.

Li H, Kuman K, Lotter M, Leader G, Gibbon R R Soc Open Sci. 2017; 4(6):170288.

PMID: 28680682 PMC: 5493924. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170288.