» Articles » PMID: 20300857

A Computational and Experimental Study Inside Microfluidic Systems: the Role of Shear Stress and Flow Recirculation in Cell Docking

Overview
Date 2010 Mar 20
PMID 20300857
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, microfluidic devices containing microwells that enabled cell docking were investigated. We theoretically assessed the effect of geometry on recirculation areas and wall shear stress patterns within microwells and studied the relationship between the computational predictions and experimental cell docking. We used microchannels with 150 microm diameter microwells that had either 20 or 80 microm thickness. Flow within 80 microm deep microwells was subject to extensive recirculation areas and low shear stresses (<0.5 mPa) near the well base; whilst these were only presented within a 10 microm peripheral ring in 20 microm thick microwells. We also experimentally demonstrated that cell docking was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in 80 microm thick microwells as compared to 20 microm thick microwells. Finally, a computational tool which correlated physical and geometrical parameters of microwells with their fluid dynamic environment was developed and was also experimentally confirmed.

Citing Articles

Computational and experimental studies of a cell-imprinted-based integrated microfluidic device for biomedical applications.

Yazdian Kashani S, Moraveji M, Bonakdar S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):12130.

PMID: 34108580 PMC: 8190060. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91616-2.


3D Cell Culture for the Study of Microenvironment-Mediated Mechanostimuli to the Cell Nucleus: An Important Step for Cancer Research.

Chhetri A, Rispoli J, Lelievre S Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8:628386.

PMID: 33644116 PMC: 7902798. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.628386.


A 3-dimensional microfluidic platform for modeling human extravillous trophoblast invasion and toxicological screening.

Pu Y, Gingrich J, Veiga-Lopez A Lab Chip. 2020; 21(3):546-557.

PMID: 33166377 PMC: 8212566. DOI: 10.1039/d0lc01013h.


Microfluidic Biofabrication of 3D Multicellular Spheroids by Modulation of Non-geometrical Parameters.

Lopa S, Piraino F, Talo G, Mainardi V, Bersini S, Pierro M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:366.

PMID: 32432090 PMC: 7214796. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00366.


The advection of microparticles, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in response to very low Reynolds numbers.

Morley S, Walsh M, Newport D Biomicrofluidics. 2017; 11(3):034105.

PMID: 28529671 PMC: 5419862. DOI: 10.1063/1.4983149.


References
1.
Wang Z, Kim M, Marquez M, Thorsen T . High-density microfluidic arrays for cell cytotoxicity analysis. Lab Chip. 2007; 7(6):740-5. DOI: 10.1039/b618734j. View

2.
Khademhosseini A, Langer R, Borenstein J, Vacanti J . Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(8):2480-7. PMC: 1413775. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507681102. View

3.
Koh W, Revzin A, Pishko M . Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel microstructures encapsulating living cells. Langmuir. 2002; 18(7):2459-62. DOI: 10.1021/la0115740. View

4.
Whitesides G, Ostuni E, Takayama S, Jiang X, Ingber D . Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001; 3:335-73. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.335. View

5.
Sia S, Whitesides G . Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis. 2003; 24(21):3563-76. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200305584. View