» Articles » PMID: 2026650

Foot Protein Isoforms Are Expressed at Different Times During Embryonic Chick Skeletal Muscle Development

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1991 May 1
PMID 2026650
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have investigated the time course of expression of the alpha and beta triad junctional foot proteins in embryonic chick pectoral muscle. The level of [3H]ryanodine binding in muscle homogenates is low until day E20 of embryonic development, then increases dramatically at the time of hatching reaching adult levels by day N7 posthatch. The alpha and beta foot protein isoforms increase in abundance concomitantly with [3H]ryanodine binding. Using foot protein isoform-specific antibodies, the alpha foot protein is detected in a majority of fibers in day E10 muscle, while the beta isoform is first observed at low levels in a few fibers in day E15 muscle. A high molecular weight polypeptide, distinct from the alpha and beta proteins, is recognized by antifoot protein antibodies. This polypeptide is observed in day E8 muscle and declines in abundance with continued development. It appears to exist as a monomer and does not bind [3H]ryanodine. In contrast, the alpha isoform present in day E10 muscle and the beta isoform in day E20 muscle are oligomeric and bind [3H]ryanodine suggesting that they may exist as functional calcium channels in differentiating muscle. Comparison of the intracellular distributions of the alpha foot protein, f-actin, the heavy chain of myosin and titin in day E10 muscle indicates that the alpha foot protein is expressed during myofibril assembly and Z line formation. The differential expression of the foot protein isoforms in developing muscle, and their continued expression in mature muscle, is consistent with these proteins making different functional contributions. In addition, the expression of the alpha isoform during the time of organization of a differentiated muscle morphology suggests that foot proteins may participate in events involved in muscle differentiation.

Citing Articles

Detection of calcium sparks in intact and permeabilized skeletal muscle fibers.

Weisleder N, Zhou J, Ma J Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 798:395-410.

PMID: 22130850 PMC: 3658452. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-343-1_23.


Three-dimensional electron microscopy reveals new details of membrane systems for Ca2+ signaling in the heart.

Hayashi T, Martone M, Yu Z, Thor A, Doi M, Holst M J Cell Sci. 2009; 122(Pt 7):1005-13.

PMID: 19295127 PMC: 2720931. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.028175.


Altered Ca2+ sparks in aging skeletal and cardiac muscle.

Weisleder N, Ma J Ageing Res Rev. 2008; 7(3):177-88.

PMID: 18272434 PMC: 2812416. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2007.12.003.


Unitary Ca2+ current through mammalian cardiac and amphibian skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor Channels under near-physiological ionic conditions.

Kettlun C, Gonzalez A, Rios E, Fill M J Gen Physiol. 2003; 122(4):407-17.

PMID: 12975450 PMC: 2233776. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200308843.


Single-target molecule detection with nonbleaching multicolor optical immunolabels.

Schultz S, Smith D, Mock J, Schultz D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(3):996-1001.

PMID: 10655473 PMC: 15499. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.3.996.


References
1.
Ishikawa H . Formation of elaborate networks of T-system tubules in cultured skeletal muscle with special reference to the T-system formation. J Cell Biol. 1968; 38(1):51-66. PMC: 2107470. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.38.1.51. View

2.
LOWRY O, ROSEBROUGH N, FARR A, RANDALL R . Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193(1):265-75. View

3.
Olmsted J . Affinity purification of antibodies from diazotized paper blots of heterogeneous protein samples. J Biol Chem. 1981; 256(23):11955-7. View

4.
Pezzementi L, Schmidt J . Ryanodine alters the rate of acetylcholine receptor synthesis in chick skeletal muscle cell cultures. J Biol Chem. 1981; 256(24):12651-4. View

5.
Bruns R, Pugsley T . A rapid filtration assay for soluble receptors using polyethylenimine-treated filters. Anal Biochem. 1983; 132(1):74-81. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90427-x. View