» Articles » PMID: 20230633

Lack of Neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in Patients Treated with Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2010 Mar 17
PMID 20230633
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Some studies reported the possible induction of food allergy, caused by neo-sensitization to cross-reacting allergens, during immunotherapy with aeroallergens, while other studies ruled out such possibility.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 (tropomyosin) as well as the appearance of reactions after ingestion of foods containing tropomyosin as a consequence of sublingual mite immunization.

Materials And Methods: Specific IgE to Tropomyosin (rPen a 1) before and after mite sublingual immunotherapy in 134 subjects were measured. IgE-specific antibodies for mite extract and recombinant allergen Pen a 1 were evaluated using the immunoenzymatic CAP system (Phadia Diagnostics, Milan, Italy).

Results: All patients had rPen a 1 IgE negative results before and after mite SLIT and did not show positive shrimp extract skin reactivity and serological rPen a 1 IgE conversion after treatment. More important, no patient showed systemic reactions to crustacean ingestion.

Conclusions: Patients did not show neo-sensitization to tropomyosin, a component of the extract (namely mite group 10) administered. An assessment of a patient's possible pre-existing sensitisation to tropomyosin by skin test and/or specific IgE prior to start mite extract immunotherapy is recommended.

Trial Registration: This trial is registered in EudraCT, with the ID number of 2010-02035531.

Citing Articles

Dietary Habits in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Evaluation of Food as Trigger of Symptoms Exacerbation.

Sanchez J, Sanchez A, Cardona R Dermatol Res Pract. 2018; 2018:6703052.

PMID: 30018635 PMC: 6029436. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6703052.


High rate of house dust mite sensitization in a shrimp allergic southern Ontario population.

Rosenfield L, Tsoulis M, Milio K, Schnittke M, Kim H Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2017; 13:5.

PMID: 28115965 PMC: 5244585. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-017-0177-x.


Shellfish and House Dust Mite Allergies: Is the Link Tropomyosin?.

Wong L, Huang C, Lee B Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016; 8(2):101-6.

PMID: 26739402 PMC: 4713872. DOI: 10.4168/aair.2016.8.2.101.


Cross-reactivity between aeroallergens and food allergens.

Popescu F World J Methodol. 2015; 5(2):31-50.

PMID: 26140270 PMC: 4482820. DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i2.31.


Clinical and immunological changes of immunotherapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: randomized controlled trial.

Sanchez Caraballo J, Cardona Villa R ISRN Allergy. 2013; 2012:183983.

PMID: 23724240 PMC: 3658480. DOI: 10.5402/2012/183983.


References
1.
Moverare R, Elfman L, Vesterinen E, Metso T, Haahtela T . Development of new IgE specificities to allergenic components in birch pollen extract during specific immunotherapy studied with immunoblotting and Pharmacia CAP System. Allergy. 2002; 57(5):423-30. DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.13248.x. View

2.
Ball T, Sperr W, Valent P, Lidholm J, Spitzauer S, Ebner C . Induction of antibody responses to new B cell epitopes indicates vaccination character of allergen immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol. 1999; 29(6):2026-36. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199906)29:06<2026::AID-IMMU2026>3.0.CO;2-2. View

3.
Asero R . Lack of de novo sensitization to tropomyosin in a group of mite-allergic patients treated by house dust mite-specific immunotherapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005; 137(1):62-5. DOI: 10.1159/000085105. View

4.
Arlian L, Morgan M, Vyszenski-Moher D, Sharra D . Cross-reactivity between storage and dust mites and between mites and shrimp. Exp Appl Acarol. 2008; 47(2):159-72. DOI: 10.1007/s10493-008-9199-x. View

5.
Thomas W, Smith W, Hales B, Mills K, OBrien R . Characterization and immunobiology of house dust mite allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002; 129(1):1-18. DOI: 10.1159/000065179. View