» Articles » PMID: 20230422

Validation of a Clinical Algorithm to Identify Low-risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Hematology
Date 2010 Mar 17
PMID 20230422
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We previously derived a clinical prognostic algorithm to identify patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) who are at low risk of short-term mortality and who could be safely discharged early or treated entirely in an outpatient setting.

Objectives: To externally validate the clinical prognostic algorithm in an independent patient sample.

Methods: We validated the algorithm in 983 consecutive patients prospectively diagnosed with PE at an emergency department of a university hospital. Patients with none of the algorithm's 10 prognostic variables (age > or = 70 years, cancer, heart failure, chronic lung disease, chronic renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulse > or = 110 min(-1), systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, oxygen saturation < 90%, and altered mental status) at baseline were defined as being at low risk. We compared 30-day overall mortality among low-risk patients, on the basis of the algorithm, between the validation sample and the original derivation sample. We also assessed the rate of PE-related and bleeding-related mortality among low-risk patients.

Results: Overall, the algorithm classified 16.3% of patients with PE as being at low risk. Mortality at 30 days was 1.9% among low-risk patients, and did not differ between the validation sample and the original derivation sample. Among low-risk patients, only 0.6% died from definite or possible PE, and 0% died from bleeding.

Conclusions: This study validates an easy-to-use, clinical prognostic algorithm for PE that accurately identifies patients with PE who are at low risk of short-term mortality. Patients who are at low risk according to our algorithm are potential candidates for less costly outpatient treatment.

Citing Articles

Baseline platelet count and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute venous thromboembolism: a prospective cohort study.

Stuby J, Stalder O, Limacher A, Righini M, Rodondi N, Tritschler T Ann Hematol. 2024; 103(11):4721-4729.

PMID: 39249495 PMC: 11534830. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05982-8.


Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Emergency Department: Results of an Italian Nominal Group Technique Study.

Salvi A, Nitti C, Fabbri A, Groff P, Ruggiero E, Agnelli G Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020; 26:1076029620959720.

PMID: 33112649 PMC: 7791439. DOI: 10.1177/1076029620959720.


Elevated HbA1c is not associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism in the elderly, but with all-cause mortality- the SWEETCO 65+ study.

Mathis A, Villiger L, Reiner M, Egloff M, Schmid H, Stivala S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):2495.

PMID: 32051462 PMC: 7016100. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59173-2.


Educational Level, Anticoagulation Quality, and Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Hofmann E, Faller N, Limacher A, Mean M, Tritschler T, Rodondi N PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162108.

PMID: 27606617 PMC: 5015908. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162108.


Prognostic models in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elias A, Mallett S, Daoud-Elias M, Poggi J, Clarke M BMJ Open. 2016; 6(4):e010324.

PMID: 27130162 PMC: 4854007. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010324.