Epigenetic Histone Modifications of Human Transposable Elements: Genome Defense Versus Exaptation

Overview

Journal Mob DNA

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Genetics

Date 2010 Mar 16

PMID 20226072

Citations 38

Authors

Ahsan Huda

Leonardo Marino-Ramirez

I King Jordan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Transposition is disruptive in nature and, thus, it is imperative for host genomes to evolve mechanisms that suppress the activity of transposable elements (TEs). At the same time, transposition also provides diverse sequences that can be exapted by host genomes as functional elements. These notions form the basis of two competing hypotheses pertaining to the role of epigenetic modifications of TEs in eukaryotic genomes: the genome defense hypothesis and the exaptation hypothesis. To date, all available evidence points to the genome defense hypothesis as the best explanation for the biological role of TE epigenetic modifications.

Results: We evaluated several predictions generated by the genome defense hypothesis versus the exaptation hypothesis using recently characterized epigenetic histone modification data for the human genome. To this end, we mapped chromatin immunoprecipitation sequence tags from 38 histone modifications, characterized in CD4+ T cells, to the human genome and calculated their enrichment and depletion in all families of human TEs. We found that several of these families are significantly enriched or depleted for various histone modifications, both active and repressive. The enrichment of human TE families with active histone modifications is consistent with the exaptation hypothesis and stands in contrast to previous analyses that have found mammalian TEs to be exclusively repressively modified. Comparisons between TE families revealed that older families carry more histone modifications than younger ones, another observation consistent with the exaptation hypothesis. However, data from within family analyses on the relative ages of epigenetically modified elements are consistent with both the genome defense and exaptation hypotheses. Finally, TEs located proximal to genes carry more histone modifications than the ones that are distal to genes, as may be expected if epigenetically modified TEs help to regulate the expression of nearby host genes.

Conclusions: With a few exceptions, most of our findings support the exaptation hypothesis for the role of TE epigenetic modifications when vetted against the genome defense hypothesis. The recruitment of epigenetic modifications may represent an additional mechanism by which TEs can contribute to the regulatory functions of their host genomes.

Citing Articles

discovery of repetitive elements as key sequence determinants of 3D genome folding.

Gunsalus L, Keiser M, Pollard K Cell Genom. 2023; 3(10):100410.

PMID: 37868032 PMC: 10589630. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100410.

Transposable elements as tissue-specific enhancers in cancers of endodermal lineage.

Karttunen K, Patel D, Xia J, Fei L, Palin K, Aaltonen L Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5313.

PMID: 37658059 PMC: 10474299. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41081-4.

Widespread Exaptation of L1 Transposons for Transcription Factor Binding in Breast Cancer.

Jiang J, Rothnagel J, Upton K Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(11).

PMID: 34070697 PMC: 8199441. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115625.

Sequence deeper without sequencing more: Bayesian resolution of ambiguously mapped reads.

Shah R, Ruthenburg A PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(4):e1008926.

PMID: 33872311 PMC: 8084338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008926.

Transposable element regulation and expression in cancer.

Grundy E, Diab N, Chiappinelli K FEBS J. 2021; 289(5):1160-1179.

PMID: 33471418 PMC: 11577309. DOI: 10.1111/febs.15722.

References

Silva J, Shabalina S, Harris D, Spouge J, Kondrashovi A . Conserved fragments of transposable elements in intergenic regions: evidence for widespread recruitment of MIR- and L2-derived sequences within the mouse and human genomes. Genet Res. 2003; 82(1):1-18. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672303006268. View

Lippman Z, Martienssen R . The role of RNA interference in heterochromatic silencing. Nature. 2004; 431(7006):364-70. DOI: 10.1038/nature02875. View

Yoder J, Walsh C, Bestor T . Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 1997; 13(8):335-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01181-5. View

Li H, Ruan J, Durbin R . Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res. 2008; 18(11):1851-8. PMC: 2577856. DOI: 10.1101/gr.078212.108. View

Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld J, Schones D, Barski A, Cuddapah S . Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2008; 40(7):897-903. PMC: 2769248. DOI: 10.1038/ng.154. View

Jurka J . Subfamily structure and evolution of the human L1 family of repetitive sequences. J Mol Evol. 1989; 29(6):496-503. DOI: 10.1007/BF02602921. View

Grewal S, Elgin S . Transcription and RNA interference in the formation of heterochromatin. Nature. 2007; 447(7143):399-406. PMC: 2950806. DOI: 10.1038/nature05914. View

Feschotte C . Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(5):397-405. PMC: 2596197. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2337. View

Volpe T, Kidner C, Hall I, Teng G, Grewal S, Martienssen R . Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science. 2002; 297(5588):1833-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1074973. View

10.

Kidwell , Lisch . Transposable elements and host genome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15(3):95-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01817-0. View

11.

Karolchik D, Baertsch R, Diekhans M, Furey T, Hinrichs A, Lu Y . The UCSC Genome Browser Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(1):51-4. PMC: 165576. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg129. View

12.

Jurka J, Kapitonov V, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J . Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 110(1-4):462-7. DOI: 10.1159/000084979. View

13.

Doolittle W, Sapienza C . Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980; 284(5757):601-3. DOI: 10.1038/284601a0. View

14.

Kapitonov V, Jurka J . The age of Alu subfamilies. J Mol Evol. 1996; 42(1):59-65. DOI: 10.1007/BF00163212. View

15.

Pauler F, Sloane M, Huang R, Regha K, Koerner M, Tamir I . H3K27me3 forms BLOCs over silent genes and intergenic regions and specifies a histone banding pattern on a mouse autosomal chromosome. Genome Res. 2008; 19(2):221-33. PMC: 2652204. DOI: 10.1101/gr.080861.108. View

16.

Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh T, Schones D, Wang Z . High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007; 129(4):823-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009. View

17.

Kondo Y, Issa J . Enrichment for histone H3 lysine 9 methylation at Alu repeats in human cells. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(30):27658-62. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M304072200. View

18.

Orgel L, Crick F . Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980; 284(5757):604-7. DOI: 10.1038/284604a0. View

19.

Suzuki M, Bird A . DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(6):465-76. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2341. View

20.

Kapitonov V, Jurka J . A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(5):411-2. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2165-c1. View