The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. III: Validity of Axis I Diagnoses

Overview

Journal J Orofac Pain

Specialties Dentistry
Neurology
Psychiatry

Date 2010 Mar 10

PMID 20213030

Citations 30

Authors

Edmond Truelove

Wei Pan

John O Look

Lloyd A Mancl

Richard K Ohrbach

Ana M Velly

Kimberly H Huggins

Patricia Lenton

Eric L Shiffman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: To estimate the criterion validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I TMD diagnoses.

Methods: A combined total of 614 TMD community and clinic cases and 91 controls were examined at three study sites. RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses were algorithmically derived from an examination performed by calibrated dental hygienists. Reference standards ("gold standards") were established by means of consensus diagnoses rendered by two TMD experts using all available clinical data, including imaging findings. Validity of the RDC/TMD Axis I TMD diagnoses was estimated relative to the reference-standard diagnoses (gold standard diagnoses). Target sensitivity and specificity were set a priori at greater than or equal to 0.70 and greater than or equal to 0.95, respectively.

Results: Target sensitivity and specificity were not observed for any of the eight RDC/TMD diagnoses. The highest validity was achieved for Group Ia myofascial pain (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.92) and Group Ib myofascial pain with limited opening (sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.92). Target sensitivity and specificity were observed only when both Group I diagnoses were combined (0.87 and 0.98, respectively). For Group II (disc displacements) and Group III (arthralgia, arthritis, arthrosis) diagnoses, all estimates for sensitivity were below target (0.03 to 0.53), and specificity ranged from below to on target (0.86 to 0.99).

Conclusion: The RDC/TMD Axis I TMD diagnoses did not reach the targets set at sensitivity of > or = 0.70 and specificity of > or = 0.95. Target validity was obtained only for myofascial pain without differentiation between normal and limited opening. Revision of the current Axis I TMD diagnostic algorithms is warranted to improve their validity.

Citing Articles

Temporomandibular disorder prevalence in malocclusion patients: a meta-analysis.

Huang L, Xu Y, Xiao Z, Liu Y, Luo F Head Face Med. 2025; 21(1):13.

PMID: 40011997 PMC: 11863559. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-025-00490-0.

Age-stratified analysis of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using cone-beam computed tomography.

Song H, Choi H, Shin B, Kim Y, Park M, Kim C Imaging Sci Dent. 2024; 54(1):71-80.

PMID: 38571783 PMC: 10985520. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20230229.

Clinical aspects of mastication myalgia-an overview.

Barjandi G, Svedenlof J, Jasim H, Collin M, Hedenberg-Magnusson B, Christidis N Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024; 4:1306475.

PMID: 38264542 PMC: 10803665. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1306475.

DC/TMD Axis I diagnostic subtypes in TMD patients from Confucian heritage cultures: a stratified reporting framework.

Yap A, Lei J, Fu K, Kim S, Lee B, Park J Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(8):4459-4470.

PMID: 37243820 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05067-2.

Biometric Assessment of Temporomandibular Disorders in Orthodontics: A Multi-arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Maurya R, Singh H, Talwar B, Sharma P, Kapoor P Turk J Orthod. 2023; 35(4):290-306.

PMID: 36594551 PMC: 9885786. DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21116.

References

Shaefer J, Jackson D, Schiffman E, Anderson Q . Pressure-pain thresholds and MRI effusions in TMJ arthralgia. J Dent Res. 2001; 80(10):1935-9. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800101401. View

Look J, John M, Tai F, Huggins K, Lenton P, Truelove E . The Research Diagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures. J Orofac Pain. 2010; 24(1):25-34. PMC: 3098131. View

Kokkonen S, Kurunlahti M, Tervonen O, Ilkko E, Vanharanta H . Endplate degeneration observed on magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: correlation with pain provocation and disc changes observed on computed tomography diskography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(20):2274-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200210150-00017. View

Emshoff R, Brandlmaier I, Bosch R, Gerhard S, Rudisch A, Bertram S . Validation of the clinical diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders for the diagnostic subgroup - disc derangement with reduction. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(12):1139-45. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00980.x. View

Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L . Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem. 2003; 49(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1373/49.1.1. View

Schmitter M, Kress B, Rammelsberg P . Temporomandibular joint pathosis in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and a clinical examination based on a specific set of criteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97(3):318-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.009. View

Tognini F, Manfredini D, Montagnani G, Bosco M . Is clinical assessment valid for the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disk displacement?. Minerva Stomatol. 2004; 53(7-8):439-48. View

DeRogatis L, Lipman R, Covi L . SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973; 9(1):13-28. View

Davies H, Kaye M, Rhodes J, Dart A, Henderson A . Diagnosis of oesophageal spasm by ergometrine provocation. Gut. 1982; 23(2):89-97. PMC: 1419545. DOI: 10.1136/gut.23.2.89. View

10.

Janssens J, VANTRAPPEN G, Ghillebert G . 24-hour recording of esophageal pressure and pH in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology. 1986; 90(6):1978-84. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90270-2. View

11.

Vaksmann G, DUCLOUX G, Caron C, Manouvrier J, Millaire A . The ergometrine test: effects on esophageal motility in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries. Can J Cardiol. 1987; 3(4):168-72. View

12.

Thevenet P, Gosselin A, Bourdonnec C, Gosselin M, Bretagne J, GASTARD J . [pHmetry and manometry of the esophagus in patients with pain of the angina type and a normal angiography]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1988; 12(2):111-7. View

13.

McFadden J . The stress lumbar discogram. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(8):931-3. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198808000-00012. View

14.

Wolfe F, Smythe H, Yunus M, Bennett R, Bombardier C, Goldenberg D . The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33(2):160-72. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780330203. View

15.

Wise C, Semble E, Dalton C . Musculoskeletal chest wall syndromes in patients with noncardiac chest pain: a study of 100 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73(2):147-9. View

16.

Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkin S . Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992; 50(2):133-149. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4. View

17.

Smith P, Hadgu A . Sensitivity and specificity for correlated observations. Stat Med. 1992; 11(11):1503-9. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780111108. View

18.

Dworkin S, LeResche L . Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992; 6(4):301-55. View

19.

Schwarzer A, Derby R, Aprill C, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N . The value of the provocation response in lumbar zygapophyseal joint injections. Clin J Pain. 1994; 10(4):309-13. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199412000-00011. View

20.

Barclay P, Hollender L, Maravilla K, Truelove E . Comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in patients with disk displacement in the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 88(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70191-5. View