» Articles » PMID: 20207785

Predicting Habitual Walking Performance in Multiple Sclerosis: Relevance of Capacity and Self-report Measures

Overview
Journal Mult Scler
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Mar 9
PMID 20207785
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective was to establish the extent to which physical functioning capacity and self-report measures are able to predict the habitual walking performance in ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. Fifty persons with multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS, 1.5-6.5) were tested on leg muscle strength as well as walking and balance capacity, and completed self-report indices on perceived physical functioning. Habitual walking performance, that is, the real amount of steps that is performed in the customary living environment, was registered by means of an ambulant accelerometer-based monitor during seven consecutive days. Mild (EDSS 1.5-4.0, n = 29) and moderate (EDSS 4.5-6.5, n = 21) multiple sclerosis subgroups were additionally distinguished as predictor variables and values were hypothesized to differ depending on multiple sclerosis severity and concomitant ambulatory function. Multiple regression analyses yielded a single most significant predictor for each (sub)group with other variables making no independent contribution to the variation in habitual walking performance. For the total study sample, this was the 6-Minute Walking Test (R(2) = 0.458, p < 0.01). In the mild multiple sclerosis subgroup, the 6-Minute Walking Test was again most predictive, yet to a modest degree (R(2) = 0. 187, p = 0.02). In the moderate multiple sclerosis subgroup, the 2-Minute Walking Test explained over half of the variance (R(2) = 0.532, p < 0.01). Habitual walking performance is best reflected by longer walking capacity tests. The extent to which it can be predicted based on clinical testing is larger in a multiple sclerosis patient sample with more severe walking disability. Ambulatory monitoring, however, includes aspects of community ambulation not captured in the clinic, and must be considered as an additional outcome for evaluating interventions in multiple sclerosis.

Citing Articles

Smartphone-based gait analysis in the assessment of fatigue and fatigability in people with multiple sclerosis: a supervised cohort study.

Schonherr C, Ziegler J, Zentek T, Rashid A, Strauss S, Tallner A J Neurol. 2025; 272(3):217.

PMID: 39985679 PMC: 11846754. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12906-7.


Maintaining Mobility and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Examining Potential Impact of Symptomatic Pharmacotherapy.

Jones A, Purohit R, Bhatt T, Motl R CNS Drugs. 2025; 39(4):361-382.

PMID: 39954116 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01159-7.


Walk Longer! Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Uncover Which Gait Aspects Should Be Treated to Increase Walking Endurance in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Carpinella I, Bertoni R, Anastasi D, Cardini R, Lencioni T, Ferrarin M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39599061 PMC: 11598194. DOI: 10.3390/s24227284.


Effects of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation on everyday life physical activity and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Prigent G, Aminian K, Gonzenbach R, April R, Paraschiv-Ionescu A J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):88.

PMID: 38807215 PMC: 11131212. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01383-0.


Soft robotic apparel to avert freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease.

Kim J, Porciuncula F, Yang H, Wendel N, Baker T, Chin A Nat Med. 2024; 30(1):177-185.

PMID: 38182783 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02731-8.