» Articles » PMID: 20205791

Overview of a Formal Scoping Review on Health System Report Cards

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2010 Mar 9
PMID 20205791
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is an extensive body of literature on health system quality reporting that has yet to be characterized. Scoping is a novel methodology for systematically assessing the breadth of a body of literature in a particular research area. Our objectives were to showcase the scoping review methodology in the review of health system quality reporting, and to report on the extent of the literature in this area.

Methods: A scoping review was performed based on the York methodology outlined by Arksey and O'Malley from the University of York, United Kingdom. We searched 14 peer reviewed and grey literature databases limiting the search to English language and non-English language articles with English abstracts published between 1980 and June 2006 with an update to November 2008. We also searched specific websites, reference lists, and key journals for relevant material and solicited input from key stakeholders. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied to select relevant material and qualitative information was charted from the selected literature.

Results: A total of 10,102 articles were identified from searching the literature databases, 821 were deemed relevant to our scoping review. An additional 401 were identified from updates, website searching, references lists, key journals, and stakeholder suggestions for a total of 1,222 included articles. These were categorized and catalogued according to the inclusion criteria, and further subcategories were identified through the charting process. Topic areas represented by this review included the effectiveness of health system report cards (n = 194 articles), methodological issues in their development (n = 815 articles), stakeholder views on report cards (n = 144 articles), and ethical considerations around their development (n = 69 articles).

Conclusions: The scoping review methodology has permitted us to characterize and catalogue the extensive body of literature pertaining to health system report cards. The resulting literature repository that our review has created can be of use to researchers and health system stakeholders interested in the topic of health system quality measurement and reporting.

Citing Articles

Integrating ICT in education: A scoping review of pre-service teachers' ICT beliefs.

Li H PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0317591.

PMID: 39919072 PMC: 11805408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317591.


A Scoping Review and Assessment of the Area-Level Composite Measures That Estimate Social Determinants of Health Across the United States.

Hassett T, Stuhlsatz G, Snyder J Public Health Rep. 2024; 140(1):67-102.

PMID: 39663655 PMC: 11569672. DOI: 10.1177/00333549241252582.


Key components of rehabilitation programmes for adults with complex fractures following traumatic injury: A scoping review.

Silvester L, Higo A, Kearney R, McWilliams D, Palmer S Injury. 2024; 55(10):111801.

PMID: 39128165 PMC: 11422290. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111801.


Digital rights and mobile health in Southeast Asia: A scoping review.

Poulsen A, Song Y, Fosch-Villaronga E, LaMonica H, Iannelli O, Alam M Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241257058.

PMID: 38812846 PMC: 11135094. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241257058.


Mental health reported in adult invasive home mechanical ventilation through a tracheostomy: A scoping review.

Pedersen M, Handberg C, Dreyer P Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 4:100110.

PMID: 38745622 PMC: 11080294. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100110.


References
1.
Brown A, Bhimani H, Macleod H . Making performance reports work. Healthc Pap. 2005; 6(2):8-22. DOI: 10.12927/hcpap.2005.17745. View

2.
Perlin J, Kolodner R, Roswell R . The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am J Manag Care. 2004; 10(11 Pt 2):828-36. View

3.
Grant M, Booth A . A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2):91-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. View

4.
Marshall M, Shekelle P, Davies H, Smith P . Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22(3):134-48. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.134. View

5.
Sanmartin C, Murphy K, Choptain N, Conner-Spady B, McLaren L, Bohm E . Appropriateness of healthcare interventions: concepts and scoping of the published literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008; 24(3):342-9. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462308080458. View