» Articles » PMID: 20203277

Evaluation of the Reproducibility in the Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Images of the Temporomandibular Joint

Overview
Date 2010 Mar 6
PMID 20203277
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to determine the intra- and interexaminer reproducibility in the interpretation of MRI of the temporomandibular joint among independent observers, with respect to six specific articular characteristics, and to discover which of these had greater and lesser agreement.

Methods: 30 magnetic resonance examinations of temporomandibular joints of adults were independently interpreted by 9 experienced and trained observers at 2 different times. Observers were divided into three groups according to their specialties: surgeon dentists specialized in temporomandibular dysfunction and orofacial pain, surgeon dentists specialized in radiology and medical doctors specialized in radiology. The reproducibility analysis was carried out using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: The interexaminer reproducibility ranged from slight to fair. The intraexaminer reproducibility ranged from slight to no agreement. In the interexaminer evaluation, anterior disc displacement without reduction presented greater agreement, whereas change in condylar head shape showed the poorest agreement. In the intraexaminer evaluation, anterior disc displacement without reduction presented slight agreement, whereas, for the other characteristics, no agreement was observed.

Conclusion: Examiners do not demonstrate reproducibility in the interpretation of MRI of temporomandibular joints. Therefore, more efforts are necessary with respect to understanding the changes that may be detected in these images in terms of diagnosis and appropriate treatment approaches.

Citing Articles

Influence of examiner calibration on clinical and MRI diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disc displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maracci L, Savegnago G, Antoniazzi R, Marquezan M, Silva T, Liedke G Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024; 53(6):341-353.

PMID: 38970385 PMC: 11358637. DOI: 10.1093/dmfr/twae027.


Automated segmentation of articular disc of the temporomandibular joint on magnetic resonance images using deep learning.

Ito S, Mine Y, Yoshimi Y, Takeda S, Tanaka A, Onishi A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):221.

PMID: 34997167 PMC: 8741780. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04354-w.


Web-based calibration of observers using MRI of the temporomandibular joint.

Hellen-Halme K, Hollender L, Janda M, Petersson A Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(8):656-61.

PMID: 22554988 PMC: 3528206. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/82622690.

References
1.
Rudisch A, Innerhofer K, Bertram S, Emshoff R . Magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement and effusion in patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92(5):566-71. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.116817. View

2.
Nebbe B, Brooks S, Hatcher D, Hollender L, Prasad N, Major P . Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: interobserver agreement in subjective classification of disk status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 90(1):102-7. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.106300. View

3.
Landis J, Koch G . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):159-74. View

4.
Schellhas K . Temporomandibular joint injuries. Radiology. 1989; 173(1):211-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.173.1.2781010. View

5.
Cholitgul W, Petersson A, Rohlin M, Tanimoto K, Akerman S . Diagnostic outcome and observer performance in sagittal tomography of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1990; 19(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.19.1.2201577. View