» Articles » PMID: 20202545

Limbal Relaxing Incisions at the Time of Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation to Reduce Astigmatism with or Without Subsequent Laser in Situ Keratomileusis

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2010 Mar 6
PMID 20202545
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) to reduce astigmatism at the time of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Setting: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Methods: This retrospective review comprised consecutive patients who had LRIs at the time of lens extraction and AcrySof ReSTOR IOL implantation. A subgroup of patients had subsequent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for residual refractive error correction.

Results: The study evaluated 73 eyes (59 patients); 21 eyes (28.7%) of 59 patients had further LASIK (LRI+LASIK). The mean follow-up was 13.2 months +/- 6.4 (SD). The mean keratometric astigmatism decreased from 1.49 +/- 0.71 diopters (D) preoperatively to 0.56 +/- 0.57 D at the last follow-up (P<.001). Although the LRI+LASIK group had significantly greater corneal astigmatism than the LRI-only group preoperatively (P = .005) and 1 month (P = .030) and 6-months (P = .014) postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups at the last follow-up (P = .528). At the last follow-up, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/25 or better and the uncorrected near visual acuity was J1 or better in 32 (76%) of 42 eyes in the LRI-only group and in 17 (81%) of 21 eyes in the LRI+LASIK group.

Conclusion: Limbal relaxing incisions at the time of apodized diffractive multifocal IOL implantation, with or without subsequent LASIK, were effective and safe in reducing astigmatism.

Citing Articles

Managing low corneal astigmatism in patients with presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses: a narrative review.

Rocha-de-Lossada C, Rodriguez-Vallejo M, Rodriguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, Ribeiro F, Fernandez J BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):254.

PMID: 37280550 PMC: 10243013. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03003-2.


Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review.

Gonzalez-Cruces T, Cano-Ortiz A, Sanchez-Gonzalez M, Sanchez-Gonzalez J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022; 260(11):3437-3452.

PMID: 35713710 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05728-0.


Perception of Trifocal IOL Performance in Young Adults with High Astigmatism and Hyperopia and its Improvement Using Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Semiz F, Lokaj A, Caliskan G, Verlato G, Musa N, Semiz C Acta Inform Med. 2021; 29(2):118-124.

PMID: 34584335 PMC: 8443134. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.118-124.


Premium intraocular lenses: The past, present and future.

Zvornicanin J, Zvornicanin E J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018; 30(4):287-296.

PMID: 30555960 PMC: 6276729. DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.003.


Effect of Limbal relaxing incisions during implantable collamer lens surgery.

Li Z, Han Y, Hu B, Du H, Hao G, Chen X BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1):63.

PMID: 28482825 PMC: 5422880. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0458-7.