» Articles » PMID: 20202351

Patient Satisfaction with Point-of-care Testing in General Practice

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2010 Mar 6
PMID 20202351
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Point-of-care testing is increasingly being used in general practice to assist GPs in their management of patients with chronic disease. However, patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in general practice has not been widely studied.

Aim: To determine if patients are more satisfied with point-of-care testing than with pathology laboratory testing for three chronic conditions.

Design Of Study: As part of a large multicentre, randomised, controlled trial assessing the use of point-of-care testing in Australian general practice, satisfaction was measured for patients having pathology testing performed by point-of-care testing devices or pathology laboratories. Patients in the trial were managed by GPs for diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and/or anticoagulant therapy.

Method: Patient satisfaction was measured using level of agreement with a variety of statements at the end of the study with a patient satisfaction questionnaire for both the intervention and control groups. Analysis was performed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with allowance for clustering at the practice level following Box-Cox transformations of the data to achieve normality.

Results: Overall, intervention patients reported that they were satisfied with point-of-care testing. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group had a higher level of agreement than control patients with statements relating to their satisfaction with the collection process (P<0.001) and confidence in the process (P<0.001). They also viewed point-of-care testing as strengthening their relationship with their GP (P = 0.010) and motivational in terms of better managing their condition (P<0.001).

Conclusion: The results from this trial support patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in a general practice setting.

Citing Articles

A CRISPR mediated point-of-care assay for the detection of mucosal calprotectin in an animal model of ulcerative colitis.

Chia S, Guo T, Goldys E, Payne S, Duan W, Lovell N Bioeng Transl Med. 2025; 10(2):e10725.

PMID: 40060765 PMC: 11883116. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10725.


Regulation and governance for the implementation and management of point-of-care testing in Australia: a scoping review.

Prestedge J, Kaufman C, Williamson D BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):758.

PMID: 39994584 PMC: 11849271. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21894-2.


An Assessment of the Feasibility, Patient Acceptance, and Performance of Point-of-Care Transient Elastography for Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Das T, Meng X, Abdallah M, Bilal M, Sarwar R, Shaukat A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39594144 PMC: 11592655. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222478.


Diagnostic accuracy of Cardiochek PA point-of-care testing (POCT) analyser with a 3-in-1 lipid panel for epidemiological surveys.

Lourdes T, Chong Z, Saminathan T, Abd Hamid H, Rifin H, Wan K Lipids Health Dis. 2024; 23(1):297.

PMID: 39267137 PMC: 11391592. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02270-2.


Barriers, enablers, benefits, and drawbacks to point-of-care testing: a survey of the general practice out-of-hours service in Scotland.

Mills S, Akbar S, Hernandez-Santiago V BJGP Open. 2023; 8(2).

PMID: 38092440 PMC: 11300988. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0094.


References
1.
Laurence C, Gialamas A, Yelland L, Bubner T, Ryan P, Willson K . A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Trials. 2008; 9:50. PMC: 2519057. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-50. View

2.
Shiach C, Campbell B, Poller L, Keown M, Chauhan N . Reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing in a community clinic: a randomized crossover comparison with hospital laboratory testing. Br J Haematol. 2002; 119(2):370-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03888.x. View

3.
Chaudhry R, Scheitel S, Stroebel R, Santrach P, Dupras D, Tangalos E . Patient satisfaction with point-of-care international normalized ratio testing and counseling in a community internal medicine practice. Manag Care Interface. 2004; 17(3):44-6. View

4.
Grieve R, Beech R, Vincent J, Mazurkiewicz J . Near patient testing in diabetes clinics: appraising the costs and outcomes. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 3(15):1-74. View

5.
Kerse N, Buetow S, Mainous 3rd A, Young G, Coster G, Arroll B . Physician-patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2(5):455-61. PMC: 1466710. DOI: 10.1370/afm.139. View