» Articles » PMID: 20195846

International Comparison of Cost of Falls in Older Adults Living in the Community: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2010 Mar 3
PMID 20195846
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Summary: Our objective was to determine international estimates of the economic burden of falls in older people living in the community. Our systematic review emphasized the need for a consensus on methodology for cost of falls studies to enable more accurate comparisons and subgroup-specific estimates among different countries.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine international estimates of the economic burden of falls in older people living in the community.

Methods: This is a systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles reporting estimates for the cost of falls in people aged > or =60 years living in the community. We searched for papers published between 1945 and December 2008 in MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, and NHS EED databases that identified cost of falls in older adults. We extracted the cost of falls in the reported currency and converted them to US dollars at 2008 prices, cost items measured, perspective, time horizon, and sensitivity analysis. We assessed the quality of the studies using a selection of questions from Drummond's checklist.

Results: Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies varied with respect to viewpoint of the analysis, definition of falls, identification of important and relevant cost items, and time horizon. Only two studies reported a sensitivity analysis and only four studies identified the viewpoint of their economic analysis. In the USA, non-fatal and fatal falls cost US $23.3 billion (2008 prices) annually and US $1.6 billion in the UK.

Conclusions: The economic cost of falls is likely greater than policy makers appreciate. The mean cost of falls was dependent on the denominator used and ranged from US $3,476 per faller to US $10,749 per injurious fall and US $26,483 per fall requiring hospitalization. A consensus on methodology for cost of falls studies would enable more accurate comparisons and subgroup-specific estimates among different countries.

Citing Articles

Sarcopenia, Depressive Symptoms, and Fall Risk: Insights from a National Cohort Study in the Chinese Population.

Zhang X, Ye D, Dou Q, Xie F, Zeng R, Zhu K Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025; 18:593-603.

PMID: 40008027 PMC: 11853770. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S497087.


Process evaluation of technologically assisted senior care using mixed methods: Results of the virtual assisted living (VAL, German: VBW Virtuell Betreutes Wohnen) project.

Jansen E, Supplieth J, Lech S, Zollick J, Schuster J Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076241308445.

PMID: 39949842 PMC: 11822844. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241308445.


Relationship between typical fall patterns and fall-related fractures in older Japanese adults.

Yamada M, Terao Y, Kojima I, Tanaka S, Saegusa H, Nanbu M Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2025; 101(2):98-106.

PMID: 39924178 PMC: 11893222. DOI: 10.2183/pjab.101.004.


SDES-YOLO: A high-precision and lightweight model for fall detection in complex environments.

Huang X, Li X, Yuan L, Jiang Z, Jin H, Wu W Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2026.

PMID: 39814943 PMC: 11735607. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86593-9.


Gender differences in the incidence, characteristics and hospital admission outcomes of fall-related injuries in older adults in Victoria, Australia, over 5 years from 2018/19 to 2022/23.

Berecki-Gisolf J, Rezaei-Darzi E, Natora A Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1426726.

PMID: 39610389 PMC: 11602514. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1426726.


References
1.
Tinetti M, Speechley M, Ginter S . Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319(26):1701-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604. View

2.
Hodgson T, Meiners M . Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1982; 60(3):429-62. View

3.
Moher D, Cook D, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999; 354(9193):1896-900. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5. View

4.
Yabroff K, Warren J, Banthin J, Schrag D, Mariotto A, Lawrence W . Comparison of approaches for estimating prevalence costs of care for cancer patients: what is the impact of data source?. Med Care. 2009; 47(7 Suppl 1):S64-9. PMC: 2718428. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a23e25. View

5.
Welte R, Feenstra T, Jager H, Leidl R . A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22(13):857-76. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422130-00004. View