Clinical Measurement of the Thoracic Kyphosis. A Study of the Intra-rater Reliability in Subjects with and Without Shoulder Pain

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2010 Mar 3

PMID 20193055

Citations 31

Authors

Jeremy S Lewis

Rachel E Valentine

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Clinical sagittal plane assessment of the thoracic kyphosis angle is considered an essential component of the postural examination of patients presenting with upper body pain syndromes. Cervical headaches and conditions involving the shoulder, such as subacromial pain syndrome, have all been associated with an increase in the thoracic kyphosis. Concomitantly a decrease in the thoracic kyphosis as a result of a stretching and strengthening rehabilitation programme is believed to be associated with a reduction in symptoms and pain and improvement in function. Clinicians generally measure the sagittal plane kyphosis angle visually. There is no certainty that this method is reliable or is capable of measuring angular changes over time or in response to intervention. As such a simple and reliable clinical method of measuring the thoracic kyphosis would enable clinicians to record this information. The aim of this investigation was to determine the intra-tester reliability of measuring the thoracic kyphosis angle using a clinical method

Methods: Measurements were made in 45 subjects with and 45 subjects without upper body symptoms. Measurements were made with the subjects in relaxed standing. Two gravity dependent inclinometers were used to measure the kyphosis. The first was placed over the region of the 1st and 2nd thoracic spinous processes. The other, over the region of the 12th thoracic and 1st lumbar spinous processes. The angle produced by each inclinometer was measured 3 times in succession. Each set of 3 measurements was made on two occasions (separated by a minimum of 30 minutes and additional data collection involving 46 further measurements of posture and movement on the same and an additional subject before the thoracic kyphosis measurements were re-measured) by one rater. The reliability of the measurements was analyzed using 2-way ANOVA intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standard error of measurement (SEM) for precision, for a single measurement [ICC(single)] and the average of 3 measures [ICC(average)]. The assessor remained 'blinded' to data input and the measurements were staggered to reduce examiner bias.

Results: The measurement of the thoracic kyphosis as used in this investigation was found to have excellent intra-rater reliability for both subjects with and without symptoms. The ICC(single) results for the subjects without symptoms were, .95; (95% CI .91-.97). The corresponding ICC(average) results were; .97; (95% CI .95-.99). The results for the subjects with symptoms were; 93; (95% CI .88-.96), for ICC(single) and for ICC(average); .97; (95% CI .94-.98). The SEM results for subjects without and with symptoms were 1.0 degrees and 1.7 degrees , respectively.

Conclusions: The findings of this immediate test-retest reliability study suggest that the clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis using gravity dependent inclinometers demonstrates excellent intra-rater reliability. Additional research is required to determine the inter-rater reliability of this method.

Trial Registration: National Research Register: N0060148286.

Citing Articles

Reliability of a Measurement Method for Upper Limb Raised Standing Spinal Alignment Using a Smartphone Inclinometer Application.

Takayama H, Miyawaki K, Nakamura M Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76225.

PMID: 39845224 PMC: 11751372. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76225.

Impact of the Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver on Spinal Extensor Muscle Activity: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial Involving Individuals with Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

Soylu C, Atalay E, Turker D, Yildirim Sahan T, Un Yildirim N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767514 PMC: 11675683. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121675.

Breast size, thoracic kyphosis, and thoracic spine pain: a correlational survey of Nigerian postpartum mothers.

Petronilla O, Chinecherem E, Sunday E BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):934.

PMID: 39563285 PMC: 11577858. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07978-x.

Unveiling the Respiratory Muscle Strength in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: The Impact of Nutrition and Thoracic Deformities, Beyond Spirometry.

Yuksel Kalyoncu M, Gokdemir Y, Yilmaz Yegit C, Yanaz M, Gulieva A, Selcuk M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39201929 PMC: 11352812. DOI: 10.3390/children11080994.

Effects of Limbs' Spasticity on Spinopelvic Alignment in Post-Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Bissolotti L, Brojka A, Vezzoli M, Calza S, Nicoli F, Romero-Morales C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999407 PMC: 11242033. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133840.

References

French S, Green S, Forbes A . Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23(4):231-8. DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2000.106101. View

Fon G, Pitt M, Thies Jr A . Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980; 134(5):979-83. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.134.5.979. View

Larson K, Oatis C . Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Phys Ther. 1992; 72(6):425-31. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/72.6.425. View

Lewis J, Green A, Wright C . Subacromial impingement syndrome: the role of posture and muscle imbalance. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(4):385-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.08.007. View

Goh S, Price R, Leedman P, Singer K . A comparison of three methods for measuring thoracic kyphosis: implications for clinical studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000; 39(3):310-5. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.310. View

Wang C, McClure P, Pratt N, Nobilini R . Stretching and strengthening exercises: their effect on three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(8):923-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90084-9. View

Walter S, Eliasziw M, Donner A . Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998; 17(1):101-10. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::aid-sim727>3.0.co;2-e. View

Watson D, Trott P . Cervical headache: an investigation of natural head posture and upper cervical flexor muscle performance. Cephalalgia. 1993; 13(4):272-84; discussion 232. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1993.1304272.x. View

Borstad J . Resting position variables at the shoulder: evidence to support a posture-impairment association. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(4):549-57. View

10.

Kibler W . The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(2):325-37. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260022801. View

11.

Horter T . How to care for your neck. Phys Ther. 1978; 58(2):184-5. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/58.2.184. View

12.

de Smet A, Robinson R, Johnson B, Lukert B . Spinal compression fractures in osteoporotic women: patterns and relationship to hyperkyphosis. Radiology. 1988; 166(2):497-500. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.2.3336728. View

13.

Bari M, Chiarlone M, Matteuzzi D, Zacchei S, Pozzi C, Bellia V . Thoracic kyphosis and ventilatory dysfunction in unselected older persons: an epidemiological study in Dicomano, Italy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52(6):909-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52257.x. View

14.

Valentine R, Lewis J . Intraobserver reliability of 4 physiologic movements of the shoulder in subjects with and without symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(9):1242-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.008. View

15.

Briggs A, Wrigley T, Tully E, ADAMS P, Greig A, Bennell K . Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36(8):761-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0284-8. View

16.

Ryan S, Fried L . The impact of kyphosis on daily functioning. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45(12):1479-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03199.x. View

17.

Billis E, Foster N, Wright C . Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation. Man Ther. 2003; 8(4):223-32. DOI: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00017-1. View

18.

Sahrmann S, Azevedo D, Van Dillen L . Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017; 21(6):391-399. PMC: 5693453. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001. View

19.

Lewis J, Valentine R . The pectoralis minor length test: a study of the intra-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy in subjects with and without shoulder symptoms. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8:64. PMC: 1934353. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-64. View

20.

Schenkman M, Rugo de Cartaya V . Kinesiology of the shoulder complex. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1987; 8(9):438-50. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1987.8.9.438. View