Odor Detection by Humans of Lineal Aliphatic Aldehydes and Helional As Gauged by Dose-response Functions

Overview

Journal Chem Senses

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2010 Mar 2

PMID 20190010

Citations 10

Authors

J Enrique Cometto-Muniz

Michael H Abraham

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We have measured concentration detection (i.e., psychometric) functions to determine the odor detectability of homologous aliphatic aldehydes (propanal, butanal, hexanal, octanal, and nonanal) and helional. Subjects (16 < or = n < or = 18) used a 3-alternative forced-choice procedure against carbon-filtered air (blanks), under an ascending concentration approach. Generation, delivery, and control of each vapor were achieved via an 8-station vapor delivery device. Gas chromatography served to quantify the concentrations presented. Group and individual functions were modeled by a sigmoid (logistic) equation. Odor detection thresholds (ODTs) were defined as the concentration producing a detectability (P) halfway (P = 0.5) between chance (P = 0.0) and perfect detection (P = 1.0). ODTs decreased with carbon chain length: 2.0, 0.46, 0.33, and 0.17 ppb, respectively, from propanal to octanal, but the threshold increased for nonanal (0.53 ppb), revealing maximum sensitivity for the 8-carbon member. The strong olfactory receptor (OR) ligands octanal and helional (0.14 ppb) showed the lowest thresholds. ODTs fell at the lower end of previously reported values. Interindividual variability (ODT ratios) amounted to a factor ranging from 10 to 50, lower than typically reported, and was highest for octanal and hexanal. The behavioral dose-response functions emerge at concentrations 2-5 orders of magnitude lower than those required for functions tracing the activation of specific human ORs by the same aldehydes in cell/molecular studies, after all functions were expressed as vapor concentrations.

Citing Articles

Parameter Mapping Sonification of Human Olfactory Thresholds.

Boeve J, Giot R Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37237484 PMC: 10215924. DOI: 10.3390/biology12050670.

Ethanolic Fermentation of Rye Mashes: Factors Influencing the Formation of Aldehydes and Process Efficiency.

Pielech-Przybylska K, Balcerek M, Klebeko M, Dziekonska-Kubczak U, Hebdzynski M Biomolecules. 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36008979 PMC: 9405562. DOI: 10.3390/biom12081085.

Effect of Dams and Suckling Lamb Feeding Systems on the Fatty Acid Composition of Suckling Lamb Meat.

Battacone G, Lunesu M, Rassu S, Pulina G, Nudda A Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(11).

PMID: 34827874 PMC: 8614422. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113142.

Sniff-synchronized, gradient-guided olfactory search by freely moving mice.

Findley T, Wyrick D, Cramer J, Brown M, Holcomb B, Attey R Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 33942713 PMC: 8169121. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.58523.

Evaluation of Perceptual Interactions between Ester Aroma Components in Langjiu by GC-MS, GC-O, Sensory Analysis, and Vector Model.

Niu Y, Liu Y, Xiao Z Foods. 2020; 9(2).

PMID: 32069959 PMC: 7073725. DOI: 10.3390/foods9020183.

References

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W, Abraham M, Sanchez-Moreno R . Concentration-detection functions for eye irritation evoked by homologous n-alcohols and acetates approaching a cut-off point. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 182(1):71-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0966-4. View

Mizrahi A, Matsunami H, Katz L . An imaging-based approach to identify ligands for olfactory receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2004; 47(5):661-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.020. View

Doszczak L, Kraft P, Weber H, Bertermann R, Triller A, Hatt H . Prediction of perception: probing the hOR17-4 olfactory receptor model with silicon analogues of bourgeonal and lilial. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007; 46(18):3367-71. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200605002. View

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W, Abraham M . Nasal pungency and odor of homologous aldehydes and carboxylic acids. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 118(2):180-8. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050270. View

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W . Nasal pungency, odor, and eye irritation thresholds for homologous acetates. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991; 39(4):983-9. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90063-8. View

Malnic B . Searching for the ligands of odorant receptors. Mol Neurobiol. 2007; 35(2):175-81. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-007-0013-2. View

Krautwurst D, Yau K, Reed R . Identification of ligands for olfactory receptors by functional expression of a receptor library. Cell. 1999; 95(7):917-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81716-x. View

Buck L . Olfactory receptors and odor coding in mammals. Nutr Rev. 2005; 62(11 Pt 2):S184-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00097.x. View

Jacquier V, Pick H, Vogel H . Characterization of an extended receptive ligand repertoire of the human olfactory receptor OR17-40 comprising structurally related compounds. J Neurochem. 2006; 97(2):537-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03771.x. View

10.

Spehr M, Schwane K, Heilmann S, Gisselmann G, Hummel T, Hatt H . Dual capacity of a human olfactory receptor. Curr Biol. 2004; 14(19):R832-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.034. View

11.

Vidic J, Grosclaude J, Monnerie R, Persuy M, Badonnel K, Baly C . On a chip demonstration of a functional role for Odorant Binding Protein in the preservation of olfactory receptor activity at high odorant concentration. Lab Chip. 2008; 8(5):678-88. DOI: 10.1039/b717724k. View

12.

Stary A, Suwattanasophon C, Wolschann P, Buchbauer G . Differences in (-)citronellal binding to various odorant receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007; 361(4):941-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.137. View

13.

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W . Sensory reactions of nasal pungency and odor to volatile organic compounds: the alkylbenzenes. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1994; 55(9):811-7. DOI: 10.1080/15428119491018529. View

14.

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W . Thresholds for odor and nasal pungency. Physiol Behav. 1990; 48(5):719-25. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90217-r. View

15.

Hatt H, Gisselmann G, Wetzel C . Cloning, functional expression and characterization of a human olfactory receptor. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 1999; 45(3):285-91. View

16.

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W, Abraham M . Quantification of chemical vapors in chemosensory research. Chem Senses. 2003; 28(6):467-77. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/28.6.467. View

17.

Peterlin Z, Li Y, Sun G, Shah R, Firestein S, Ryan K . The importance of odorant conformation to the binding and activation of a representative olfactory receptor. Chem Biol. 2008; 15(12):1317-27. PMC: 2628580. DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.014. View

18.

Cometto-Muniz J, Cain W, Abraham M . Molecular restrictions for human eye irritation by chemical vapors. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 207(3):232-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.02.004. View

19.

Cain W . Testing olfaction in a clinical setting. Ear Nose Throat J. 1989; 68(4):316, 322-8. View

20.

Wetzel C, Oles M, Wellerdieck C, Kuczkowiak M, Gisselmann G, Hatt H . Specificity and sensitivity of a human olfactory receptor functionally expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and Xenopus Laevis oocytes. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(17):7426-33. PMC: 6782526. View