» Articles » PMID: 20187174

A Concentration-independent Method to Measure Exchange Rates in PARACEST Agents

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2010 Feb 27
PMID 20187174
Citations 96
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficiency of chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST) agents is largely determined by their water or proton exchange kinetics, yet methods to measure such exchange rates are variable and many are not applicable to in vivo measurements. In this work, the water exchange kinetics of two prototype paramagnetic agents (PARACEST) are compared by using data from classic NMR line-width measurements, by fitting CEST spectra to the Bloch equations modified for chemical exchange, and by a method where CEST intensity is measured as a function of applied amplitude of radiofrequency field. A relationship is derived that provides the water exchange rate from the X-intercept of a plot of steady-state CEST intensity divided by reduction in signal caused by CEST irradiation versus 1/omega(1)(2), referred to here as an omega plot. Furthermore, it is shown that this relationship is independent of agent concentration. Exchange rates derived from omega plots using either high-resolution CEST NMR data or CEST data obtained by imaging agree favorably with exchange rates measured by the more commonly used Bloch fitting and line-width methods. Thus, this new method potentially allows access to a direct measure of exchange rates in vivo, where the agent concentration is typically unknown.

Citing Articles

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents (GBCAs) for MRI: A Benefit-Risk Balance Analysis from a Chemical, Biomedical, and Environmental Point of View.

Scarciglia A, Papi C, Romiti C, Leone A, Di Gregorio E, Ferrauto G Glob Chall. 2025; 9(3):2400269.

PMID: 40071223 PMC: 11891575. DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202400269.


Metabolic PCTA-Based Shift Reagents for the Detection of Extracellular Lactate Using CEST MRI.

Chiaffarelli R, Cruz P, Cotton J, Kelm T, Lee S, Ghaderian M JACS Au. 2025; 5(2):779-790.

PMID: 40017765 PMC: 11862947. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.4c01020.


Evaluation of Brain Impairment Using Proton Exchange Rate MRI in a Kainic Acid-Induced Rat Model of Epilepsy.

Yang H, Wu Q, Li L, Wu Y Mol Imaging Biol. 2025; 27(1):1-9.

PMID: 39747781 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-024-01980-4.


Physics-guided multi-dimensional scan optimization and quasi-steady-state reconstruction to enhance CEST MRI sensitivity efficiency and quantification accuracy.

Sun P J Magn Reson. 2024; 370():107821.

PMID: 39689390 PMC: 11725439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107821.


Motion and magnetic field inhomogeneity correction techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: A contemporary review.

Simegn G, Sun P, Zhou J, Kim M, Reddy R, Zu Z NMR Biomed. 2024; 38(1):e5294.

PMID: 39532518 PMC: 11606773. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5294.


References
1.
Zhang S, Wu K, Sherry A . Unusually sharp dependence of water exchange rate versus lanthanide ionic radii for a series of tetraamide complexes. J Am Chem Soc. 2002; 124(16):4226-7. DOI: 10.1021/ja017133k. View

2.
Liu G, Li Y, Pagel M . Design and characterization of a new irreversible responsive PARACEST MRI contrast agent that detects nitric oxide. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58(6):1249-56. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21428. View

3.
Pikkemaat J, Wegh R, Lamerichs R, van de Molengraaf R, Langereis S, Burdinski D . Dendritic PARACEST contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2007; 2(5):229-39. DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.149. View

4.
Zhang S, Malloy C, Sherry A . MRI thermometry based on PARACEST agents. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127(50):17572-3. PMC: 2570850. DOI: 10.1021/ja053799t. View

5.
Li A, Hudson R, Barrett J, Jones C, Pasternak S, Bartha R . Four-pool modeling of proton exchange processes in biological systems in the presence of MRI-paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) agents. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60(5):1197-206. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21752. View