» Articles » PMID: 20186771

Characterization of Formulation Parameters Affecting Low Molecular Weight Drug Release from in Situ Forming Drug Delivery Systems

Overview
Date 2010 Feb 27
PMID 20186771
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In situ forming implants (ISFI) have shown promise in delivering adjuvant chemotherapy following minimally invasive cancer therapies such as thermal ablation of tumors. Although ISFI systems have been thoroughly investigated for delivery of high molecular weight (Mw) therapeutics, little research has been conducted to optimize their design for delivery of low Mw drugs. This study examined the effect of varying the formulation components on the low Mw drug release profile from a ISFI consisting of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), fluorescein (model drug), and excipient dissolved in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP). Effects of varying PLGA Mw, excipient concentration, and drug loading were studied. Additionally, solubility studies were conducted to determine the critical water concentration required for phase inversion. Results demonstrated that PLGA Mw was the most significant factor in modulating low Mw drug release from the ISFI systems. ISFI formulations comprised of a low Mw (16 kDa) PLGA showed a significantly (p < 0.05) lower burst release (after 24 h), 28.2 +/- 0.5%, compared with higher Mw PLGA (60 kDa), 55.1 +/- 3.1%. Critical water concentration studies also demonstrated that formulations with lower Mw PLGA had increased solubility in water and may thus require more time to phase invert and release the drug.

Citing Articles

Physicochemical Property Effects on Immune Modulating Polymeric Nanoparticles: Potential Applications in Spinal Cord Injury.

Kolpek D, Kim J, Mohammed H, Gensel J, Park J Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:13357-13374.

PMID: 39691455 PMC: 11649979. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S497859.


Minimally-invasive implantable device enhances brain cancer suppression.

Cao X, Li J, Ren J, Peng J, Zhong R, He J EMBO Mol Med. 2024; 16(7):1704-1716.

PMID: 38902433 PMC: 11250787. DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00091-5.


Numerical Mechanistic Modelling of Drug Release from Solvent-Removal Zein-Based In Situ Gel.

Senarat S, Pornsawad P, Lertsuphotvanit N, Ostergaard J, Phaechamud T Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37896160 PMC: 10609933. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15102401.


Long-acting injectable multipurpose prevention technology for prevention of HIV and unplanned pregnancy.

Young I, Pallerla A, Cottrell M, Maturavongsadit P, Prasher A, Shrivastava R J Control Release. 2023; 363:606-620.

PMID: 37797892 PMC: 10841820. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.10.006.


Mechanistic Computational Modeling of Implantable, Bioresorbable Drug Release Systems.

Giolando P, Hopkins K, Davis B, Vike N, Ahmadzadegan A, Ardekani A Adv Mater. 2023; 35(51):e2301698.

PMID: 37243452 PMC: 10697660. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202301698.


References
1.
Sartor O . Eligard: leuprolide acetate in a novel sustained-release delivery system. Urology. 2003; 61(2 Suppl 1):25-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02396-8. View

2.
Weinberg B, Ai H, Blanco E, Anderson J, Gao J . Antitumor efficacy and local distribution of doxorubicin via intratumoral delivery from polymer millirods. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 81(1):161-70. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30914. View

3.
Eliaz R, Kost J . Characterization of a polymeric PLGA-injectable implant delivery system for the controlled release of proteins. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 50(3):388-96. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<388::aid-jbm13>3.0.co;2-f. View

4.
Saltzman , Fung . Polymeric implants for cancer chemotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997; 26(2-3):209-230. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00036-7. View

5.
McHugh A . The role of polymer membrane formation in sustained release drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2005; 109(1-3):211-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.038. View