» Articles » PMID: 20186152

Practice and Awareness of Physicians Regarding Home Blood Pressure Measurement in Japan

Overview
Journal Hypertens Res
Date 2010 Feb 27
PMID 20186152
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Japanese Society of Hypertension published guidelines for home blood pressure (HBP) measurement in 2003 and for the management of hypertension in 2004. The objective of this study was to investigate the status of physicians' practice and awareness of HBP measurement based on the Japanese guidelines and compare the status between immediately after and 4 years after publication of the guidelines. A questionnaire survey regarding HBP was conducted among physicians who attended educational seminars on hypertension in 2004-05 and in 2007-08. This questionnaire was distributed, completed, and collected just before the start of the seminars. Of the 1966 and 2995 respondents to the 2004-05 and 2007-08 surveys, respectively, 90.2 and 94.6% recommended HBP measurement to their patients. The majority of physicians recommended use of the upper-arm cuff device, and recommendation of the number of measurements, documentation and evaluation of the measured values varied widely among physicians, both in 2004-05 and in 2007-08. About 10% of physicians showed sufficient understanding of the optimal methods for HBP measurement based on Japanese guidelines both in 2004-05 and in 2007-08. Only 21.6 and 23.9% of physicians correctly recognized the reference values of hypertension based on HBP measurement (systolic/diastolic, 135/85 mm Hg) in 2004-05 and in 2007-08, respectively. Although most Japanese physicians recognized the importance of HBP measurement, many had inadequate knowledge of HBP measurement, both in 2004-05 and in 2007-08. More aggressive promotion of HBP measurement among physicians is warranted.

Citing Articles

Home blood pressure control and prescribing patterns of anti-hypertensive medications in a home blood pressure-based hypertension-specialized clinic in Japan: a sub-analysis of the Ohasama study.

Satoh M, Metoki H, Murakami T, Tatsumi Y, Asayama K, Kikuya M Hypertens Res. 2024; 48(1):26-36.

PMID: 39463432 PMC: 11700850. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01954-7.


Awareness and recommendation of home blood pressure measurement among physicians in India: Results from Asia HBPM survey 2020.

Wander G, Salman E, Matsushita N, Verma N Indian Heart J. 2023; 75(3):169-176.

PMID: 37088141 PMC: 10258377. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.04.004.


Current realities of home blood pressure monitoring from physicians' perspectives: results from Asia HBPM survey 2020.

Wang T, Ohkubo T, Bunyi M, Chadachan V, Chia Y, Kario K Hypertens Res. 2023; 46(7):1638-1649.

PMID: 37041412 PMC: 10319632. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01259-1.


Pharmacists' knowledge of automated blood pressure devices.

Noda A, Obara T, Imai Y J Hum Hypertens. 2022; 36(11):1027-1028.

PMID: 36028751 DOI: 10.1038/s41371-022-00746-1.


Predictive power of home blood pressure in the evening compared with home blood pressure in the morning and office blood pressure before treatment and in the on-treatment follow-up period: a post hoc analysis of the HOMED-BP study.

Uchida S, Kikuya M, Asayama K, Ohata C, Kimura T, Tatsumi Y Hypertens Res. 2022; 45(4):722-729.

PMID: 35177788 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00860-0.