» Articles » PMID: 20182601

The Regulation of the P53-mediated Stress Response by MDM2 and MDM4

Overview
Date 2010 Feb 26
PMID 20182601
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exquisite control of the activity of p53 is necessary for mammalian survival. Too much p53 is lethal, whereas too little permits tumorigenesis. MDM2 and MDM4 are structurally related proteins critical for the control of p53 activity during development, homeostasis, and the response to stress. These two essential proteins regulate both the activation of p53 in response to stress and the recovery of cells following resolution of the damage, yet both are oncogenic when overexpressed. Thus, multiple regulatory circuits ensure that their activities are fine-tuned to promote tumor-free survival. Numerous diverse stressors activate p53, and much research has gone into trying to find commonalities between them that would explain the mechanism by which p53 becomes active. It is now clear that although these diverse stressors activate p53 by different biochemical pathways, one common feature is the effort they direct, through a variety of means, toward disrupting the functions of both MDM2 and MDM4. This article provides an overview of the relationship between MDM2 and MDM4, features the various biochemical mechanisms by which p53 is activated through inhibition of their functions, and proposes some emerging areas for investigation of the p53-mediated stress response.

Citing Articles

Human cell-expressed tag-free rhMFG-E8 as an effective radiation mitigator.

Chaung W, Ma G, Jacob A, Brenner M, Wang P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22186.

PMID: 38092894 PMC: 10719321. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49499-y.


Single-cell multi-omics defines the cell-type-specific impact of splicing aberrations in human hematopoietic clonal outgrowths.

Cortes-Lopez M, Chamely P, Hawkins A, Stanley R, Swett A, Ganesan S Cell Stem Cell. 2023; 30(9):1262-1281.e8.

PMID: 37582363 PMC: 10528176. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.07.012.


MDM2-BCL-X PROTACs enable degradation of BCL-X and stabilization of p53.

Chang M, Gao F, Chen J, Gnawali G, Wang W Acta Mater Med. 2023; 1(3):333-342.

PMID: 36910255 PMC: 10004178. DOI: 10.15212/amm-2022-0022.


Disulfiram enhances chemotherapeutic effects of doxorubicin liposomes against human hepatocellular carcinoma via activating ROS-induced cell stress response pathways.

Lin H, Sun F, Li T, Zhang Y, Guo X, Li M Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2022; 90(6):455-465.

PMID: 36251033 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-022-04481-9.


Discrete Logic Modeling of Cell Signaling Pathways.

Ikonomi N, Werle S, Schwab J, Kestler H Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2488:159-181.

PMID: 35347689 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2277-3_12.


References
1.
Christophorou M, Ringshausen I, Finch A, Swigart L, Evan G . The pathological response to DNA damage does not contribute to p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nature. 2006; 443(7108):214-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature05077. View

2.
Mendrysa S, Perry M . The p53 tumor suppressor protein does not regulate expression of its own inhibitor, MDM2, except under conditions of stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20(6):2023-30. PMC: 110819. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.6.2023-2030.2000. View

3.
Chavez-Reyes A, Parant J, Amelse L, Montes de Oca Luna R, Korsmeyer S, Lozano G . Switching mechanisms of cell death in mdm2- and mdm4-null mice by deletion of p53 downstream targets. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(24):8664-9. View

4.
Sharp D, Kratowicz S, Sank M, GEORGE D . Stabilization of the MDM2 oncoprotein by interaction with the structurally related MDMX protein. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274(53):38189-96. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.53.38189. View

5.
Westphal C, Hoyes K, Canman C, Huang X, Kastan M, Hendry J . Loss of atm radiosensitizes multiple p53 null tissues. Cancer Res. 1998; 58(24):5637-9. View