» Articles » PMID: 20182254

A Comparison of Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Hospitalized Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

Overview
Journal J Orthop Trauma
Date 2010 Feb 26
PMID 20182254
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Osteoporosis remains underdiagnosed in orthopaedic trauma patients. Recently, protocols have emerged to identify and treat osteoporosis in this population. Our purpose was to compare the usefulness of quantitative ultrasound of calcaneus (QUS) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for identifying orthopaedic trauma patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures.

Design: A retrospective review of an osteoporosis screening protocol comparing QUS and DXA.

Setting: Regional trauma center.

Patients: Three hundred sixty consecutive hospitalized orthopaedic trauma patients treated by a single surgeon.

Intervention: QUS T-score and DXA bone mineral density T-scores (hip or radius) were obtained relative to U.S. normative data.

Main Outcome Measurements: QUS and DXA data were statistically compared to analyze their relationship. Potential thresholds for osteoporosis risk were subsequently defined.

Results: Testing was successfully performed with heel QUS in 350 patients and with DXA in 129 patients. One hundred twenty-six patients underwent testing with both modalities. According to World Health Organization criteria, 17% of patients tested with DXA had osteoporosis. A good predictive relationship between hip bone mineral density, as estimated by calcaneal QUS, and direct DXA measurement was seen (Pearson's r correlation coefficient of 0.53; area under the curve of 0.84 with 95% confidence interval=0.75-0.90; P=0.0001). QUS T-score cutoffs of greater than -0.9 resulted in 90% sensitivity (defining low osteoporosis risk) and a threshold of -1.6 or less resulted in a specificity of 80% (defining high osteoporosis risk).

Conclusions: Substantial logistical difficulties are inherent in attempting to obtain DXA scans in orthopaedic trauma patients at our regional trauma center. For those patients who did undergo DXA, a strong predictive relationship was seen between hip bone mineral density and QUS parameters. QUS thresholds in defining low- and high-risk subjects for osteoporosis in this population using this device are proposed. QUS is a simple, reliable, and relatively inexpensive tool for evaluating osteoporosis risk in orthopaedic trauma patients.

Citing Articles

The neglected association between schizophrenia and bone fragility: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Azimi Manavi B, Corney K, Mohebbi M, Quirk S, Stuart A, Pasco J Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):225.

PMID: 38816361 PMC: 11139985. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-02884-1.


Associations between physical physique/fitness in children and bone development during puberty: a 4-year longitudinal study.

Akaike A, Suzuki D, Okuyama S, Kudo Y, Shimizu H, Takanashi S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13427.

PMID: 35927458 PMC: 9352704. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17623-z.


Association of Heel Bone Mineral Density With Incident Disability and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Ross R, Shah R, Leurgans S, Buchman A, Bennett D JBMR Plus. 2020; 4(9):e10390.

PMID: 32995693 PMC: 7507511. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10390.


Quantitative examination of the bone health status of older adults with intellectual and developmental disability in Ireland: a cross-sectional nationwide study.

Burke E, Carroll R, ODwyer M, Walsh J, McCallion P, McCarron M BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e026939.

PMID: 30992292 PMC: 6500341. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026939.


Lower Bone Mineral Density is Associated with Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture.

Bernstein D, Davis J, Fairbanks C, McWilliam-Ross K, Ring D, Sanchez H Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 6(6):517-522.

PMID: 30637307 PMC: 6310189.