» Articles » PMID: 20182115

Implementation of a Longitudinal Mentored Scholarly Project: an Approach at Two Medical Schools

Overview
Journal Acad Med
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2010 Feb 26
PMID 20182115
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An increasing number of medical schools have implemented or are considering implementing scholarly activity programs as part of their undergraduate medical curricula. The goal of these programs is to foster students' analytical skills, enhance their self-directed learning and their oral and written communication skills, and ultimately to train better physicians. In this article, the authors describe the approach to implementing scholarly activities at a school that requires this activity and at a school where it is elective. Both programs have dealt with significant challenges including orienting students to a complex activity that is fundamentally different than traditional medical school courses and clerkships, helping both students and their mentors understand how to "stay on track" and complete work, especially during the third and fourth years, and educating students and mentors about the responsible conduct of research, especially involving human participants. Both schools have found the implementation process to be evolutionary, requiring experience before faculty could significantly improve processes. A required scholarly activity has highlighted the need for information technology (IT) support, including Web-based document storage and student updates, as well as automatic e-mails alerting supervisory individuals to student activity. Directors of the elective program have found difficulty with both ensuring uniform outcomes across different areas of study and leadership changes in a process that has been largely student-driven. Both programs have found that teamwork, regular meetings, and close communication have helped with implementation. Schools considering the establishment of a scholarly activity should consider these factors when designing programs.

Citing Articles

Early Exposure of Medical Students to a Formal Research Program Promotes Successful Scholarship in a Multi-Campus Medical School.

Conover G, Monk M, Nigli S, Awalt A Med Sci Educ. 2024; 34(5):1091-1103.

PMID: 39450036 PMC: 11496467. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02098-6.


Enhancing the physician-scientist workforce: evaluating a mentored research program for medical students' research competencies and intentions.

Piercy B, Miovsky N, Singh H, Afghani B, Schneider M Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39257977 PMC: 11384807. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4830569/v1.


The impact of a curriculum-based research training program on medical students' research productivity and future research interests: a longitudinal study.

Shen J, Qi H, Liu G, Li X, Fang Y BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):836.

PMID: 39095809 PMC: 11297784. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05841-0.


Implementation and evaluation of a mentorship program in clinical master in family medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic at the Arabian Gulf University: a longitudinal study.

Habbash F, Salah A, Shehata M, Makarem B, Chlif S, Almarabheh A BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):751.

PMID: 38997679 PMC: 11241932. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05677-8.


"Excited When They See Their Name in Print": Research Outputs from an Australian Medical Program.

Dinh H, Uebel K, Iqbal M, Grant A, Shulruf B, Nathan S Med Sci Educ. 2024; 34(3):639-645.

PMID: 38887404 PMC: 11180040. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02029-5.