» Articles » PMID: 20180947

Human Interphase Chromosomes: a Review of Available Molecular Cytogenetic Technologies

Overview
Journal Mol Cytogenet
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Feb 26
PMID 20180947
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human karyotype is usually studied by classical cytogenetic (banding) techniques. To perform it, one has to obtain metaphase chromosomes of mitotic cells. This leads to the impossibility of analyzing all the cell types, to moderate cell scoring, and to the extrapolation of cytogenetic data retrieved from a couple of tens of mitotic cells to the whole organism, suggesting that all the remaining cells possess these genomes. However, this is far from being the case inasmuch as chromosome abnormalities can occur in any cell along ontogeny. Since somatic cells of eukaryotes are more likely to be in interphase, the solution of the problem concerning studying postmitotic cells and larger cell populations is interphase cytogenetics, which has become more or less applicable for specific biomedical tasks due to achievements in molecular cytogenetics (i.e. developments of fluorescence in situ hybridization -- FISH, and multicolor banding -- MCB). Numerous interphase molecular cytogenetic approaches are restricted to studying specific genomic loci (regions) being, however, useful for identification of chromosome abnormalities (aneuploidy, polyploidy, deletions, inversions, duplications, translocations). Moreover, these techniques are the unique possibility to establish biological role and patterns of nuclear genome organization at suprachromosomal level in a given cell. Here, it is to note that this issue is incompletely worked out due to technical limitations. Nonetheless, a number of state-of-the-art molecular cytogenetic techniques (i.e multicolor interphase FISH or interpahase chromosome-specific MCB) allow visualization of interphase chromosomes in their integrity at molecular resolutions. Thus, regardless numerous difficulties encountered during studying human interphase chromosomes, molecular cytogenetics does provide for high-resolution single-cell analysis of genome organization, structure and behavior at all stages of cell cycle.

Citing Articles

Fusion Genes in Myeloid Malignancies.

Ang C, Than H, Tuy T, Goh Y Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682241 PMC: 11639841. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234055.


Quantitative FISHing: Implications for Chromosomal Analysis.

Vorsanova S, Yurov Y, Iourov I Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2825:239-246.

PMID: 38913313 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3946-7_13.


A Paradoxical Role for Somatic Chromosomal Mosaicism and Chromosome Instability in Cancer: Theoretical and Technological Aspects.

Iourov I, Vorsanova S, Yurov Y Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2825:67-78.

PMID: 38913303 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3946-7_3.


Systematic discovery of gene fusions in pediatric cancer by integrating RNA-seq and WGS.

van Belzen I, Cai C, van Tuil M, Badloe S, Strengman E, Janse A BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):618.

PMID: 37400763 PMC: 10318758. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11054-3.


Establishing and characterizing human stem cells from the apical papilla immortalized by hTERT gene transfer.

Cheng Q, Liu C, Chen Q, Luo W, He T, Yang D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1158936.

PMID: 37283947 PMC: 10239932. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1158936.


References
1.
Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles M, Lupski J . Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009; 10:451-81. PMC: 4472309. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164217. View

2.
Manvelyan M, Kempf P, Weise A, Mrasek K, Heller A, Lier A . Preferred co-localization of chromosome 8 and 21 in myeloid bone marrow cells detected by three dimensional molecular cytogenetics. Int J Mol Med. 2009; 24(3):335-41. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm_00000237. View

3.
Iourov I, Vorsanova S, Yurov Y . Developmental neural chromosome instability as a possible cause of childhood brain cancers. Med Hypotheses. 2009; 72(5):615-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.12.003. View

4.
Verma R, Luke S . Variations in alphoid DNA sequences escape detection of aneuploidy at interphase by FISH technique. Genomics. 1992; 14(1):113-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0888-7543(05)80291-5. View

5.
Yurov Y, Iourov I, Monakhov V, Soloviev I, Vostrikov V, Vorsanova S . The variation of aneuploidy frequency in the developing and adult human brain revealed by an interphase FISH study. J Histochem Cytochem. 2005; 53(3):385-90. DOI: 10.1369/jhc.4A6430.2005. View