» Articles » PMID: 20179690

Esophageal Motor Disorders in Terms of High-resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography: What Has Changed?

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2010 Feb 25
PMID 20179690
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The concept of high-resolution manometry (HRM) is to use sufficient pressure sensors such that intraluminal pressure can be monitored as a continuum along luminal length much as time is viewed as a continuum in conventional manometry. When HRM is coupled with pressure topography plots, pressure amplitude is transformed into spectral colors with isobaric conditions indicated by same-colored regions on the display. Together, these technologies are called high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT). HREPT has several advantages compared with conventional manometry, the technology that it was designed to replace. (i) The contractility of the entire esophagus can be viewed simultaneously in a uniform format, (ii) standardized objective metrics can be systematically applied for interpretation, and (iii) topographic patterns of contractility are more easily recognized and have greater reproducibility than with conventional manometry. Compared with conventional manometry, HREPT has improved sensitivity for detecting achalasia, largely due to the objectivity and accuracy with which it identifies impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. In addition, it has led to the subcategorization of achalasia into three clinically relevant subtypes based on the contractile function of the esophageal body: classic achalasia, achalasia with esophageal compression, and spastic achalasia. Headway has also been made in understanding hypercontractile conditions, including diffuse esophageal spasm and a newly described entity, spastic nutcracker. Ultimately, clinical experience will be the judge, but it seems likely that HREPT data, along with its well-defined functional implications, will improve the clinical management of esophageal motility disorders.

Citing Articles

A scientometrics analysis and visualization of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Zhang N, Han M, Zheng Q, Zhang M, Zhi W, Li J Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1393526.

PMID: 39139634 PMC: 11319146. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393526.


Esophageal Bolus Domain Pressure and Peristalsis Associated With Experimental Induction of Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.

Lei W, Omari T, Liu T, Wong M, Hung J, Yi C J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022; 28(1):62-68.

PMID: 34980688 PMC: 8748852. DOI: 10.5056/jnm20224.


The Relationship Between Upper Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Psychological Status in Patients with Globus Sensation.

Lan Q, Lin X, Wang Y, Xu B, Shu K, Zhang X Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14:8805-8810.

PMID: 34858048 PMC: 8630375. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S337165.


Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: An Overlapping of Clinical, Endoscopic and Manometric Features.

Karapiperis D, Malmstrom C, Vrakas S, Gil J, Ignatova S, Elmahdy S Cureus. 2021; 13(6):e15774.

PMID: 34295584 PMC: 8291461. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15774.


The Effect of Combined Guidance of Botulinum Toxin Injection with Ultrasound, Catheter Balloon, and Electromyography on Neurogenic Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Prospective Study.

Xie M, Zeng P, Wan G, An D, Tang Z, Li C Dysphagia. 2021; 37(3):601-611.

PMID: 33928464 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-021-10310-7.


References
1.
Pandolfino J, Fox M, Bredenoord A, Kahrilas P . High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009; 21(8):796-806. PMC: 2892003. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x. View

2.
Clouse R, Staiano A . Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol. 1991; 261(4 Pt 1):G677-84. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1991.261.4.G677. View

3.
Ghosh S, Pandolfino J, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas P . Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006; 290(5):G988-97. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2005. View

4.
Kahrilas P, Ghosh S, Pandolfino J . Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42(5):627-35. PMC: 2895002. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31815ea291. View

5.
Clouse R, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Haroian L . Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95(10):2720-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03178.x. View