Interferon Alpha Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with High-risk Melanoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Based on previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the use of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) in the adjuvant setting improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma. However, RCTs have yielded conflicting data on the effect of IFN-alpha on overall survival (OS).
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of IFN-alpha on DFS and OS in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma. The systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, Cochrane, ISI Web of Science, and ASCO databases. The meta-analysis was performed using time-to-event data from which hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of DFS and OS were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses to investigate the effect of dose and treatment duration were also performed. Statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: The meta-analysis included 14 RCTs, published between 1990 and 2008, and involved 8122 patients, of which 4362 patients were allocated to the IFN-alpha arm. IFN-alpha alone was compared with observation in 12 of the 14 trials, and 17 comparisons (IFN-alpha vs comparator) were generated in total. IFN-alpha treatment was associated with a statistically significant improvement in DFS in 10 of the 17 comparisons (HR for disease recurrence = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.87; P < .001) and improved OS in four of the 14 comparisons (HR for death = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.96; P = .002). No between-study heterogeneity in either DFS or OS was observed. No optimal IFN-alpha dose and/or treatment duration or a subset of patients more responsive to adjuvant therapy was identified using subgroup analysis and meta-regression.
Conclusion: In patients with high-risk cutaneous melanoma, IFN-alpha adjuvant treatment showed statistically significant improvement in both DFS and OS.
IFNλ1 is a STING-dependent mediator of DNA damage and induces immune activation in lung cancer.
Godsk S, Jensen C, Larsen T, Ahrenfeldt J, Gammelgaard K, Jakobsen M Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1525083.
PMID: 40012911 PMC: 11862833. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1525083.
Nachankar A, Pelak M, Schafasand M, Martino G, Tubin S, Hug E Int J Part Ther. 2025; 15:100738.
PMID: 39896178 PMC: 11786705. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100738.
Exosome-based immunotherapy as an innovative therapeutic approach in melanoma.
Babaei S, Fadaee M, Abbasi-Kenarsari H, Shanehbandi D, Kazemi T Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):527.
PMID: 39482766 PMC: 11526674. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01906-1.
Immunoediting Dynamics in Glioblastoma: Implications for Immunotherapy Approaches.
Amin T, Hossain A, Jerin N, Mahmud I, Rahman M, Islam S Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241290067.
PMID: 39353594 PMC: 11459535. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241290067.
Khalid M, Sutterfield B, Minley K, Ottwell R, Abercrombie M, Heath C JMIR Dermatol. 2023; 6:e43821.
PMID: 38060306 PMC: 10739238. DOI: 10.2196/43821.