» Articles » PMID: 20178770

A Differential Cell Capture Assay for Evaluating Antibody Interactions with Cell Surface Targets

Overview
Journal Anal Biochem
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Feb 25
PMID 20178770
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many biological and biomedical laboratory assays require the use of antibodies and antibody fragments that strongly bind to their cell surface targets. Conventional binding assays, such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry, have many challenges, including capital equipment requirements, labor intensiveness, and large reagent and sample consumption. Although these techniques are successful in mainstream biology, there is an unmet need for a tool to quickly ascertain the relative binding capabilities of antibodies/antibody fragments to cell surface targets on the benchtop at low cost. We describe a novel cell capture assay that enables several candidate antibodies to be evaluated quickly as to their relative binding efficacies to their cell surface targets. We used chimeric rituximab and murine anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as cell capture agents on a functionalized microscope slide surface to assess their relative binding affinities based on how well they capture CD20-expressing mammalian cells. We found that these antibodies' concentration-dependent cell capture profiles correlate with their relative binding affinities. A key observation of this assay involved understanding how differences in capture surfaces affect the assay results. This approach can find utility when an antibody or antibody fragment against a known cell line needs to be selected for targeting studies.

Citing Articles

Point-of-care (POC) devices by means of advanced MEMS.

Karsten S, Tarhan M, Kudo L, Collard D, Fujita H Talanta. 2015; 145:55-9.

PMID: 26459443 PMC: 4607928. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.04.032.


Characterization of cell seeding and specific capture of B cells in microbubble well arrays.

Jones M, Kobie J, DeLouise L Biomed Microdevices. 2013; 15(3):453-63.

PMID: 23358874 PMC: 4096952. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-013-9745-0.


A microfluidic cell concentrator.

Warrick J, Casavant B, Frisk M, Beebe D Anal Chem. 2010; 82(19):8320-6.

PMID: 20843010 PMC: 3074536. DOI: 10.1021/ac101866p.

References
1.
MacDonald K, Munster D, Clark G, Dzionek A, Schmitz J, Hart D . Characterization of human blood dendritic cell subsets. Blood. 2002; 100(13):4512-20. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2001-11-0097. View

2.
Macdonald R, Hosking C, Jones C . The measurement of relative antibody affinity by ELISA using thiocyanate elution. J Immunol Methods. 1988; 106(2):191-4. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(88)90196-2. View

3.
Hulspas R, Quesenberry P . Characterization of neurosphere cell phenotypes by flow cytometry. Cytometry. 2000; 40(3):245-50. View

4.
Michelini E, Leskinen P, Virta M, Karp M, Roda A . A new recombinant cell-based bioluminescent assay for sensitive androgen-like compound detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2005; 20(11):2261-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.10.018. View

5.
OShannessy D, Brigham-Burke M, Soneson K, HENSLEY P, Brooks I . Determination of rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance: use of nonlinear least squares analysis methods. Anal Biochem. 1993; 212(2):457-68. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1993.1355. View