Preliminary Experience with MRA in Evaluating the Degree of Carotid Stenosis and Plaque Morphology Using High-resolution Sequences After Gadofosveset Trisodium (Vasovist) Administration: Comparison with CTA and DSA

Overview

Journal Radiol Med

Specialty Radiology

Date 2010 Feb 24

PMID 20177976

Citations 9

Authors

M Anzidei

A Napoli

D Geiger

B Cavallo Marincola

C Zini

F Zaccagna

P Di Paolo

C Catalano

R Passariello

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The authors performed a preliminary study with blood-pool contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the degree of carotid artery stenosis and plaque morphology, comparing the diagnostic performance of first-pass (FP) and steady-state (SS) acquisitions with 64-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) and using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.

Materials And Methods: Twenty patients with >or=50% carotid artery stenosis at Doppler sonography underwent blood-pool contrast-enhanced MRA, CTA and DSA. Two independent radiologists evaluated MRA and CTA examinations to assess the degree of stenosis and characterise plaque morphology. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for FP, SS and CTA. The McNemar and Wilcoxon tests were used to determine significant differences (p<0.05) between the diagnostic performance of the three modalities.

Results: Forty carotid bifurcations were studied. For stenosis grading, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 90%, 89%, 90%, 89% and 90%, respectively, at FP; 95%, 95%, 95%, 95% and 95%, respectively, at SS; and 97.5%, 95%, 100%, 100% and 95%, respectively, at CTA. SS and CTA were superior to FP for evaluating the degree of stenosis (p<0.05). For evaluating plaque morphology, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 87.5%, 89%, 86%, 85% and 90%, respectively, at FP; 97.5%, 100%, 95%, 95% and 100%, respectively, at SS; and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, at CTA. There were no significant differences between FP, SS and CTA for plaque assessment (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Blood-pool contrast-enhanced MRA with SS sequences allow improved diagnostic evaluation of the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology compared with FP and is substantially equal to CTA and DSA.

Citing Articles

Carotid Plaque Vulnerability Diagnosis by CTA versus MRA: A Systematic Review.

Dakis K, Nana P, Athanasios C, Spanos K, Konstantinos B, Giannoukas A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832133 PMC: 9955971. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040646.

A Radiomics Approach to Assess High Risk Carotid Plaques: A Non-invasive Imaging Biomarker, Retrospective Study.

Chen S, Liu C, Chen X, Liu W, Ma L, Zha Y Front Neurol. 2022; 13:788652.

PMID: 35350403 PMC: 8957977. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.788652.

The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.

Stilo F, Montelione N, Calandrelli R, Distefano M, Spinelli F, Di Lazzaro V Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(19):1272.

PMID: 33178804 PMC: 7607074. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-963.

The role of carotid stenosis ultrasound scale in the prediction of ischemic stroke.

Tang Y, Wang M, Wu T, Zhang J, Yang R, Zhang B Neurol Sci. 2020; 41(5):1193-1199.

PMID: 31901124 PMC: 7196942. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-04204-8.

New developments in clinical ischemic stroke prevention and treatment and their imaging implications.

Heit J, Wintermark M J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017; 38(9):1533-1550.

PMID: 28195500 PMC: 6125964. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X17694046.

References

Knopp M, Schoenberg S, Rehm C, Floemer F, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Bock M . Assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance angiography: phase I studies. Invest Radiol. 2002; 37(12):706-15. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200212000-00011. View

Aoki S, Nakajima H, Kumagai H, Araki T . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(2):381-5. PMC: 7975334. View

Essig M, Nikolaou K, Meaney J . Magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck vessels. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17 Suppl 2:B30-7. View

Rothwell P, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov S, Fox A, Taylor D, Mayberg M . Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003; 361(9352):107-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12228-3. View

Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001; 220(1):179-85. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl35179. View

Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B, Zorger N, Draganski B, Hoelscher T . Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(6):1117-22. PMC: 8149012. View

U-King-Im J, Trivedi R, Graves M, Higgins N, Cross J, Tom B . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology. 2004; 62(8):1282-90. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000123697.89371.8d. View

Barnett H, Taylor D, Eliasziw M, Fox A, Ferguson G, Haynes R . Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(20):1415-25. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002. View

Goyen M, Shamsi K, Schoenberg S . Vasovist-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16 Suppl 2:B9-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10406-006-0162-9. View

10.

Parmelee D, Walovitch R, Ouellet H, Lauffer R . Preclinical evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and elimination of MS-325, a blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1997; 32(12):741-7. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199712000-00004. View

11.

Catalano C, Pediconi F, Nardis P, Roselli A, Cavacece M, Bertoletti L . MR angiography with MultiHance for imaging the supra-aortic vessels. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14 Suppl 7:O45-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10406-004-0063-8. View

12.

Napoli A, Catalano C, Anzidei M, Lanciotti K, Calabrese F, Cavallo Marincola B . Imaging the whole body atherosclerosis: high resolution magnetic resonance angiography using blood-pool agent. Initial clinical experience. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007; 55(3):291-301. View

13.

Bluemke D, Stillman A, Bis K, Grist T, Baum R, DAgostino R . Carotid MR angiography: phase II study of safety and efficacy for MS-325. Radiology. 2001; 219(1):114-22. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap42114. View

14.

Hartmann M, Wiethoff A, Hentrich H, Rohrer M . Initial imaging recommendations for Vasovist angiography. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16 Suppl 2:B15-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10406-006-0163-8. View

15.

Rothwell P, Coull A, Silver L, Fairhead J, Giles M, Lovelock C . Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study). Lancet. 2005; 366(9499):1773-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67702-1. View

16.

Nederkoorn P, Elgersma O, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom B, Kappelle L, Mali W . Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2003; 228(3):677-82. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2283020824. View

17.

Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, Strada L, Righi C, Politi L . Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology. 2005; 236(1):204-13. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361032048. View

18.

Wardlaw J, Chappell F, Best J, Wartolowska K, Berry E . Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 367(9521):1503-12. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68650-9. View

19.

Leclerc X, Nicol L, Gauvrit J, Le Thuc V, Leys D, Pruvo J . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(6):1021-7. PMC: 7973908. View

20.

Nikolaou K, Kramer H, Grosse C, Clevert D, Dietrich O, Hartmann M . High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. Radiology. 2006; 241(3):861-72. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413060053. View