» Articles » PMID: 20174947

Laparoscopic Colectomy is Safe and Leads to a Significantly Shorter Hospital Stay for Octogenarians

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Feb 23
PMID 20174947
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Concerns about prolonged postoperative recovery may detract surgeons from offering colectomy to patients older than 80 years. The adoption of a minimally invasive approach may help to counter these beliefs, but concerns remain as to whether these patients can tolerate a pneumoperitoneum. This study compared outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy (LC) and open colectomy (OC) for patients older than 80 years.

Methods: From a prospectively maintained database, 97 patients undergoing elective LC between 1994 and 2008 were identified and matched 1:1 to OC patients for age, gender, year of surgery, extent of resection, proximal diversion, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and body mass index. Short-term outcomes including postoperative mortality, morbidity, and discharge status were assessed.

Results: The LC and OC patients were similar for the matched characteristics. Their mean age was 82.8 years (range, 80-94 years). The conversion rate for the LC patients was 14.4%. The OC group had a higher proportion of cancer patients (93.8% vs. 59.8%; P = 0.001). The discharge status for the LC and OC patients was similar, and most patients were discharged home without assistance (63.9% vs. 62.9%; P = 0.88). The median hospital stay was significantly shorter for LC (6 days; range, 1-67 days) than for OC (7 days; range, 2-53 days; P = 0.001). The 30-day postoperative complications (OC, 43.3% vs. LC, 37.1%; P = 0.38), reoperations (OC, 5.2% vs. LC, 4.1%; P = 0.73), and readmissions (OC, 6.2% vs. LC, 9.3%; P = 0.41) were similar. The overall mortality rate was 5.2% and similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: Complications and other outcomes are similar for LC and OC, and the earlier recovery associated with LC, as evidenced by a shorter hospital stay, may encourage a wider adoption of LC for patients older than 80 years.

Citing Articles

EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.

Keller D, Curtis N, Burt H, Ammirati C, Collings A, Polk Jr H Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4104-4126.

PMID: 38942944 PMC: 11289045. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7.


Assessing and managing frailty in emergency laparotomy: a WSES position paper.

Tian B, Stahel P, Picetti E, Campanelli G, Di Saverio S, Moore E World J Emerg Surg. 2023; 18(1):38.

PMID: 37355698 PMC: 10290402. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00506-7.


Safety and Feasibility of ≤24-h Short-Stay Right Colectomies for Primary Colon Cancer.

Chen S, Radomski S, Stem M, Lo B, Safar B, Efron J World J Surg. 2023; 47(9):2267-2278.

PMID: 37140607 PMC: 10529467. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07041-1.


Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for elderly rectal cancer patients in Japan: a nationwide study.

Seishima R, Miyata H, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Shigeta K BJS Open. 2021; 5(2).

PMID: 33839748 PMC: 8038266. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab007.


Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome.

Chern Y, Hung H, You J, Hsu Y, Chiang J, Hsieh P BMC Surg. 2020; 20(1):294.

PMID: 33228630 PMC: 7686695. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00967-6.


References
1.
Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M . Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003; 13(2):95-100. DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200304000-00007. View

2.
Delaney C, Kiran R, Senagore A, Brady K, Fazio V . Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2003; 238(1):67-72. PMC: 1422656. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000074967.53451.22. View

3.
Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand H, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker S . A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(20):2050-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651. View

4.
Stocchi L, Nelson H . Laparoscopic colon resection for cancer. Adv Surg. 2006; 40:59-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2006.05.004. View

5.
Sagar P, Hartley M, Sedman P, May J, MacFie J . Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg. 1994; 81(10):1492-4. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800811031. View