Prevalence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades II/III and Cervical Cancer in Patients with Cytological Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells when High-grade Intraepithelial Lesions (ASC-H) Cannot Be Ruled out
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Context And Objective: The latest update of the Bethesda System divided the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) into ASC-US (undetermined significance) and ASC-H (high-grade intraepithelial lesion cannot be ruled out). The aims here were to measure the prevalence of pre-invasive lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN II/III) and cervical cancer among patients referred to Instituto Fernandes Figueira (IFF) with ASC-H cytology, and compare them with ASC-US cases.
Design And Setting: Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection, at the IFF Cervical Pathology outpatient clinic.
Methods: ASCUS cases referred to IFF from November 1997 to September 2007 were reviewed according to the 2001 Bethesda System to reach cytological consensus. The resulting ASC-H and ASC-US cases, along with new cases, were analyzed relative to the outcome of interest. The histological diagnosis (or cytocolposcopic follow-up in cases without such diagnosis) was taken as the gold standard.
Results: The prevalence of CIN II/III in cases with ASC-H cytology was 19.29% (95% confidence interval, CI, 9.05-29.55%) and the risk of these lesions was greater among patients with ASC-H than with ASC-US cytology (prevalence ratio, PR, 10.42; 95% CI, 2.39-45.47; P = 0.0000764). Pre-invasive lesions were more frequently found in patients under 50 years of age with ASC-H cytology (PR, 2.67; 95% CI, 0.38-18.83); P = 0.2786998). There were no uterine cervical cancer cases.
Conclusion: The prevalence of CIN II/III in patients with ASC-H cytology was significantly higher than with ASC-US, and division into ASC diagnostic subcategories had good capacity for discriminating the presence of pre-invasive lesions.
Preventing Uterine Cervix Cancer: The Clinical Meaning of Atypical Glandular Cells.
Almeida G, Sainz J, Fonseca R, Chaves N, Silva K, Nunes J Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022; 44(5):483-488.
PMID: 35139566 PMC: 9948133. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742318.
Ratree S, Kleebkaow P, Aue-Aungkul A, Temtanakitpaisan A, Chumworathayi B, Luanratanakorn S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019; 20(3):683-686.
PMID: 30909664 PMC: 6825754. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.683.
Boldrini N, Freitas L, Coutinho A, Loureiro F, Spano L, Miranda A PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102169.
PMID: 25019210 PMC: 4094527. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102169.
Lopez-Alegria F, De Lorenzi D, Quezada O Sao Paulo Med J. 2014; 132(1):15-22.
PMID: 24474075 PMC: 10889458. DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1321597.